25 C.F.R. § 292.1

What is the purpose of this part?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA) contains several exceptions under which class II or class III gaming may occur on lands acquired by the United States in trust for an Indian tribe after October 17, 1988, if other applicable requirements of IGRA are met. This part contains procedures that the Department of the Interior will use to determine whether these exceptions apply.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 2015–2019 · leading case: Stand up for California v. State of Cal., 6 Cal. App. 5th 686 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Stand up for California v. State of Cal., 6 Cal. App. 5th 686 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 4× “(See 25 C.F.R. § 292.1 .) The exception relevant to this appeal requires the Governor’s concurrence and is described in the next subpart.”

Redding Rancheria v. Kenneth Salazar, 776 F.3d 706 (9th Cir. 2015). · cites it 2× “25 C.F.R. § 292.1 . The purpose of these rules was to “explain to the public how the Department interprets” IGRA’s various exceptions and exemptions, including the restored lands exception.”

Koi Nation of N. Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, 361 F. Supp. 3d 14 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “29354 , 29354 (May 20, 2008) ("Section 20 Final Rule"); see also 25 C.F.R. § 292.1 ("This part contains procedures that the Department of the Interior *23 will use to determine whether [IGRA's Section 20] exceptions apply.”

City of Council Bluffs v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, 368 F. Supp. 3d 1276 (S.D. Iowa 2019). “See 25 C.F.R. §§ 292.1 - 292.26. The regulations set out a test for determining whether trust lands qualify for the Restored Lands Exception.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.