28 C.F.R. § 20.1
Purpose
It is the purpose of these regulations to assure that criminal history record information wherever it appears is collected, stored, and disseminated in a manner to ensure the accuracy, completeness, currency, integrity, and security of such information and to protect individual privacy.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1975–2025 · leading case: Jackie E. Utz v. Honorable Maurice Cullinane, 520 F.2d 467 (D.C. Cir. 1975).
Jackie E. Utz v. Honorable Maurice Cullinane, 520 F.2d 467 (D.C. Cir. 1975). “ral supervision of the Attorney General, and under the direction of the Deputy Attorney General, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall: :Jc * j)t (b) Conduct the acquisition, collection, exchange, classification, and preservation of identification records,…”
Cramer v. Hous. Opportunities Comm'n, 501 A.2d 35 (Md. 1985). “See, Criminal Justice Information System, 28 C.F.R. § 20.1 et seq. (1985); Maryland Code (1957, 1982 Repl.”
Charles Edward Pruett v. Edward H. Levi, Attorney Gen. of the United States, 622 F.2d 256 (6th Cir. 1980). “28 C.F.R. § 20.1 et seq. (1979). State and local enforcement agencies are required to formulate plans which will insure the completeness and accuracy of criminal records, 28 C.”
Marks v. Crim. Injuries Comp. Bd., 7 A.3d 665 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2010). “See Criminal Justice Information System, 28 C.F.R. § 20.1 et seq. (1985); Maryland Code (1957, 1982 Repl.”
Nat'l Council of La Raza v. Gonzales, 468 F. Supp. 2d 429 (E.D.N.Y 2007). “" 28 C.F.R. § 20.1 . The Court takes no position on this untested theory.”
Cent. Valley Chapter of 7th Step Found., Inc. v. Younger, 214 Cal. App. 3d 145 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989). “§ 3789g, 28 C.F.R. § 20.1 et seq., or California Penal Code §§ 849 subdivision (c), 1001.”
Hammons v. Scott, 423 F. Supp. 618 (N.D. Cal. 1976). “§ 534 ; 28 C.F.R. § 20.1 et seq. The plaintiff alleges that his attorney, through the San Francisco Police Department, has requested that both the state and federal agencies expunge the arrest record and that this request was refused.”
Tarlton v. Saxbe, 407 F. Supp. 1083 (D.D.C. 1976). ““[T]he FBI has a duty to take reasonable measures to maintain accurate criminal records, since the same concerns which led Congress to impose a duty on state and local law enforcement officials in regard to their criminal files apply equally to the FBI and its criminal files.”
McCloud, Jr. v. City of New York (E.D.N.Y 2025). “§ 3789g(b), 28 C.F.R. §§ 20.1 , 20.33, N.Y. Exec. L. § 837 (8), and 9 N.”
Alberty v. Hunter (D. Conn. 2022). “See 28 C.F.R. § 20.1 (“It is the purpose of these regulations to assure that criminal history record information wherever it appears is collected, stored, and disseminated in a manner to ensure the accuracy, completeness, currency, integrity, and security of such information and…”
Untitled Texas Attorney Gen. Opinion (Tex. Att'y Gen. 1975). “28 C. F. R. § 20.1 et seq., 40 Fed. Reg. 22114 (1975) (effective June 19, 1975).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.