28 C.F.R. § 51.25
Withdrawal of submissions
(a) A jurisdiction may withdraw a submission at any time prior to a final decision by the Attorney General. Notice of the withdrawal of a submission must be made in writing addressed to the Chief, Voting Section, Civil Rights Division, to be delivered at the addresses, telefacsimile number, or email address specified in § 51.24. The submission shall be deemed withdrawn upon the Attorney General's receipt of the notice.
(b) Notice of withdrawals will be given to interested parties registered under § 51.32.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1976–1993 · leading case: Dupree v. Moore, 831 F. Supp. 1310 (S.D. Miss. 1993).
Dupree v. Moore, 831 F. Supp. 1310 (S.D. Miss. 1993). “" In a portion of this submission letter which was labeled " 28 C.F.R. § 51.25 (b)," [8] the State described 13 of the 205 sections of the Bill.”
Haith v. Martin, 618 F. Supp. 410 (E.D.N.C. 1985). “(b) if the change affecting voting is not readily apparent on the face of the document provided under paragraph (a) or is not embodied in a document, a clear statement of the change explaining the difference between the submitted change and the prior law or practice, or…”
Dupree v. Mabus, 776 F. Supp. 290 (S.D. Miss. 1991). “28 C.F.R. § 51.25 (1986). 5 The regulations in effect in 1986 did require the submitting authority to include “a clear explanation of the change explaining the difference between the submitted change and the prior law or practice” if the change affecting voting was not readily…”
Greenville Sch. v. W. Line Sch., 575 So. 2d 956 (Miss. 1991). “The required contents of a submission were set out in 28 C.F.R. § 51.25 (7-1-86 Edition). This regulation stated in pertinent part: § 51.”
East Flatbush Election Comm. v. Cuomo, 643 F. Supp. 260 (E.D.N.Y 1986). “Guidelines for submissions to the Attorney General are spelled out in 28 C. F.R. § 51.25 (1984). The regulations require that: Each submission should contain the following information or documents to enable the Attorney General to make the required determination pursuant to…”
Harris v. Levi, 416 F. Supp. 208 (D.D.C. 1976). “” 28 C.F.R. § 51.25 (1975). Defendants, assuming arguendo, that the facts relied on by the Attorney General were previously available to Georgia, submit that the regulations were complied with.”
Mexican Am. Bar Ass'n of Tex. v. State of Tex., 755 F. Supp. 735 (W.D. Tex. 1990). “28 C.F.R. § 51.25 (a) (1990). 19 . The specific wording in the letter is “This letter is to advise you that the State of Texas is hereby resubmitting its submission of Chapter 632, Senate Bill 1379, 71st Legislature, 1989.”
— 28 C.F.R. § 51.25(b) — 1 case
Dupree v. Moore, 831 F. Supp. 1310 (S.D. Miss. 1993). “" In a portion of this submission letter which was labeled " 28 C.F.R. § 51.25 (b)," [8] the State described 13 of the 205 sections of the Bill.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.