C.F.R. » Title 28 » CHAPTER I—DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE › PART 51—PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED › Subpart E—Processing of Submissions

28 C.F.R. § 51.41

Notification of decision not to object

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The Attorney General shall within the 60-day period allowed notify the submitting authority of a decision to interpose no objection to a submitted change affecting voting.

(b) The notification shall state that the failure of the Attorney General to object does not bar subsequent litigation to enjoin the enforcement of the change.

(c) A copy of the notification shall be sent to any party who has commented on the submission or has requested notice of the Attorney General's action thereon.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1997–2010 · leading case: United States v. State of La., 952 F. Supp. 1151 (W.D. La. 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. State of La., 952 F. Supp. 1151 (W.D. La. 1997). · cites it 2× “, 28 C.F.R. § 51.41 (a) (1996). Alternatively, the jurisdiction may obtain judicial preclearance, namely, a declaratory judgment from the District Court for the District of Columbia.”
United States v. Louisiana, 952 F. Supp. 1151 (W.D. La. 1997). · cites it 2× “, 28 C.F.R. § 51.41 (a) (1996). Alternatively, the jurisdiction may obtain judicial preelearance, namely, a declaratory judgment from the District Court for the District of Columbia.”
Georgia v. Holder, 748 F. Supp. 2d 16 (D.D.C. 2010). · cites it 2× “to the Attorney General and the Attorney General has not interposed an objection within sixty days after such submission,” or “the Attorney General has affirmatively indicated that such objection will not be made.”
State of Georgia v. Holder (D.D.C. 2010). · cites it 2× “§ 1973c(a); 28 C.F.R. § 51.41 ; Morris, 432 U.S. at 502 .”
Luper v. Mun. of Anchorage, 268 F. Supp. 2d 1110 (D. Alaska 2003). “See 28 C.F.R. § 51.41 (a). Plaintiffs have raised objections to this decision to which — as of the date of this opinion — the Attorney General has not yet responded.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.