28 C.F.R. § 97.13
Maximum driving time
Companies covered under this part must adhere to the maximum driving time provisions applicable to commercial motor vehicle operators, as set forth in Department of Transportation regulations at 49 CFR 395.3 which will apply regardless of whether a private prisoner transport company is covered by Department of Transportation regulations.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2019–2022 · leading case: White v. U.S. Corr., 996 F.3d 302 (5th Cir. 2021).
White v. U.S. Corr., 996 F.3d 302 (5th Cir. 2021). “” In 28 C.F.R. § 97.13 , which refers to the maximum driving time of employees of private prisoner transportation companies, the Attorney General explained: 9 Case: 19-51074 Document: 00515846476 Page: 10 Date Filed: 05/03/2021 No.”
White v. U.S. Corr., LLC (W.D. Tex. 2019). “28 C.F.R. § 97.13 (2002). DOJ regulations further define the term “private prisoner transport company” to include “any entity, other than the United States, a State, or an inferior political subdivision of a State, that engages in the business of transporting for compensation…”
Karn v. PTS of Am., LLC (D. Maryland 2022). “In addition, Jeanna’s Act imposes standards on how long guards may operate the transport vehicles, 28 C.F.R. § 97.13 , and requires the notification of law enforcement prior to scheduled stops for food, bathrooms, or rest, 28 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.