29 C.F.R. § 2.7
[Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1974–2015 · leading case: State of Texas v. USA, 787 F.3d 733 (5th Cir. 2015).
State of Texas v. USA, 787 F.3d 733 (5th Cir. 2015). “See 29 C.F.R. § 2.7 (Department of Labor); Public Participation in Rule Making, 36 Fed.”
State of Texas v. USA, 809 F.3d 134 (5th Cir. 2015). “See 29 C.F.R. § 2.7 (Department of Labor); Public Participation in Rule Making, 36 Fed.”
Richard A. Batterton, Sec'y of Emp. & Soc. Servs. of the State of Maryland v. F. Ray Marshall, Sec'y of Labor, 648 F.2d 694 (D.C. Cir. 1980). “29 C.F.R. § 2.7 (1979) (promulgated at 36 Fed.”
Stewart v. Smith, 673 F.2d 485 (D.C. Cir. 1982). “, 29 C.F.R. § 2.7 (1981) (Department of Labor).”
Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. John W. Snow, in His Off. Capacity as Adm'r, Fed. High. Admin., 561 F.2d 227 (D.C. Cir. 1976). “National Wildlife cites legislative history indicating that the (a)(2) exemption was limited to “proprietary matters,” 15 and urges that proprietary matters be construed as limited to those functions that are essentially managerial and do not ordinarily involve questions of…”
City of Los Angeles & Cnty. of Los Angeles v. Ann McLaughlin Sec'y of Labor, & United States Dep't of Labor, 865 F.2d 1084 (9th Cir. 1989). “See 29 C.F.R. § 2.7 (1979). In 1980, the Department partially revoked its waiver, stating that the waiver was effective “except for all information-gathering procedures adopted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.”
City of New York v. Diamond, 379 F. Supp. 503 (S.D.N.Y. 1974). “29 CFR § 2.7 states: “It is the policy of the Secretary of Labor, that in applying the rule making provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act ( 5 U.”
Crown Zellerbach Corp. v. Marshall, 441 F. Supp. 1110 (E.D. La. 1977). “29 CFR 2.7. However, this regulation did not become effective until July 10, 1971, after enactment of Section 211 of the Executive Order on September 24, 1965.”
Cosby v. Ward, 843 F.2d 967 (7th Cir. 1988). “29 C.F.R. § 2.7 . This voluntary reimposition of the rules does not amount to a “procedural requirement imposed by Congress,” Chrysler Corp.”
Vigil ex rel. Vigil v. Andrus, 667 F.2d 931 (10th Cir. 1982). “Of special significance to this case is that on May 14, 1971, the Department of the Interior adopted the same requirement for it and its agencies, including the BIA, to follow in their subsequent actions.”
State of Texas v. USA (5th Cir. 2015). “See 29 C.F.R. § 2.7 (Department of Labor); Public Participation in Rule Making, 36 Fed.”
Stewart v. Smith, 673 F.2d 486 (D.C. Cir. 1982). “, 29 C.F.R. § 2.7 (1981) (Department of Labor).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.