29 C.F.R. § 541.605

Fee basis

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Administrative and professional employees may be paid on a fee basis, rather than on a salary basis. An employee will be considered to be paid on a “fee basis” within the meaning of these regulations if the employee is paid an agreed sum for a single job regardless of the time required for its completion. These payments resemble piecework payments with the important distinction that generally a “fee” is paid for the kind of job that is unique rather than for a series of jobs repeated an indefinite number of times and for which payment on an identical basis is made over and over again. Payments based on the number of hours or days worked and not on the accomplishment of a given single task are not considered payments on a fee basis.

(b) To determine whether the fee payment meets the minimum amount of salary required for exemption under these regulations, the amount paid to the employee will be tested by determining the time worked on the job and whether the fee payment is at a rate that would amount to at least the minimum salary per week, as required by §§ 541.600(a) and 541.602(a), if the employee worked 40 hours. Thus, an artist paid $350 for a picture that took 20 hours to complete meets the $684 minimum salary requirement for exemption since earnings at this rate would yield the artist $700 if 40 hours were worked.

[69 FR 22260, Apr. 23, 2004, as amended at 81 FR 32551, May 23, 2016; 84 FR 51308, Sept. 27, 2019; 89 FR 32972, Apr. 26, 2024; 91 FR 27837, May 15, 2026]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases (9 in the last 5 years), 2013–2025 · leading case: Rindfleisch v. Gentiva Health Servs., Inc., 962 F. Supp. 2d 1310 (N.D. Ga. 2013).
Rindfleisch v. Gentiva Health Servs., Inc., 962 F. Supp. 2d 1310 (N.D. Ga. 2013). · cites it 17× “575, 2], However, as discussed more fully infra, this action’s liability phase centers on the legal interpretation of two regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor: 29 C.F.R. § 541.605 and 29 C.F.R. § 541.604 .”
Resurrection Home Health Servs. v. Shannon, 2013 IL App (1st) 111605 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). · cites it 2× “29 C.F.R. § 541.605 . Section 541.605 provides as follows: “§§ 541.”
Michael Hewitt v. Helix Energy Solutions Grp., et, 983 F.3d 789 (5th Cir. 2020). “3 3 On remand, Helix may be able to demonstrate that it paid Hewitt on a “fee basis” under 29 C.F.R. § 541.605 , or that it complied with another regulatory exemption from the overtime requirements.”
Rindfleisch v. Gentiva Health Servs., Inc., 24 F. Supp. 3d 1234 (N.D. Ga. 2013). · cites it 2× “Specifically, the July 26th Order articulates the undersigned’s determination that “Gentiva’s non-visit fees under the PPV Plan do not satisfy the salary basis test under 29 C.F.R. § 541.605 , nor do they constitute extra payments under either subsection of 29 C.”
Rindfleisch v. Gentiva Health Servs., Inc., 22 F. Supp. 3d 1295 (N.D. Ga. 2014). “Specifically, the July 26th Order articulates the Court’s determination that “Gen-tiva’s non-visit fees under the PPV Plan do not satisfy the salary basis test under 29 C.F.R. § 541.605 , nor do they constitute extra payments under either subsection of 29 C.”
D'Arezzo v. Providence Ctr., Inc., 142 F. Supp. 3d 224 (D.R.I. 2015). “Plaintiffs point to 29 C.F.R. § 541.605 (2015), which explains how to calculate whether certain employees who are paid on a "fee basis” are paid a sufficiently high wage to meet the exemption threshold from the minimum wage (and overtime) provisions of the Act under Section…”
Robert Bocko v. Univ. of Maine Sys., 2024 ME 8 (Me. 2024). “118-30 ), and 29 C.F.R. § 541.605 (2022). This alignment is relevant because “[w]hen, as here, a term is not defined in either the relevant statutory provisions or in prior decisions of this court,” we “may look to analogous federal statutes, regulations, and case 17 law for…”
Delizo v. Ability Works Rehab Servs., LLC (E.D. Mich. 2020). · cites it 4× “29 C.F.R. § 541.605 (a). Here, Ability Works fails to make that showing.”
Arends v. Fam. Solutions of Ohio, Inc. (N.D. Ohio 2021). · cites it 3× “) They assert that QMHSs are paid this sum regardless of whether the employee has to work additional time to perform the service and, therefore, QMHSs are paid on a “fee basis” as that term is defined in 29 C.F.R. § 541.605 (a). (Id.) Plaintiffs argue that Defendants’ assertion…”
Jose Banuelos & Carol Ann Banuelos (Tax Ct. 2024). · cites it 2× “” 29 C.F.R. § 541.605 (a) (2019). The above-referenced regulations were promulgated for the purpose of defining employees exempted from section 13(a)(1) of the FLSA.”
Blackhawk S.D. v. PSERB (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2021). “29 C.F.R. § 541.605 (a). The School District paid Dr.”
Hoang v. Doral 888 LLC (S.D. Fla. 2023). “” 29 C.F.R. § 541.605 . One subset of bona fide professionals is the category of creative professionals.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.