The general overtime pay standard in section 7(a) requires that overtime must be compensated at a rate not less than one and one-half times the regular rate at which the employee is actually employed. The regular rate of pay at which the employee is employed may in no event be less than the statutory minimum. (The statutory minimum is the specified minimum wage applicable under section 6 of the Act, except in the case of workers specially provided for in section 14 and workers in Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and American Samoa who are covered by wage orders issued pursuant to section 8 of the Act.) If the employee's regular rate of pay is higher than the statutory minimum, his overtime compensation must be computed at a rate not less than one and one-half times such higher rate. Under certain conditions prescribed in section 7 (f), (g), and (j), the Act provides limited exceptions to the application of the general standard of section 7(a) for computing overtime pay based on the regular rate. With respect to these, see §§ 778.400 through 778.421 and 778.601 and part 548 of this chapter. The Act also provides, in section 7(b), (i), (k) and (m) and in section 13, certain partial and total exemptions from the application of section 7(a) to certain employees and under certain conditions. Regulations and interpretations concerning these exemptions are outside the scope of this part 778 and reference should be made to other applicable parts of this chapter.
[46 FR 7309, Jan. 23, 1981]
Notes of Decisions
Edward Monroe v. FTS USA, LLC, 860 F.3d 389 (6th Cir. 2017).
· cites it 2× “§ 207 ; 29 C.F.R. § 778.107 . In a piece-rate system, “the regular hourly rate of pay is computed by adding together total earnings for the workweek from piece rates and all other sources” and then dividing “by the number of hours worked in the week for which such compensation…”
Alex Reinig v. RBS Citizens NA, 912 F.3d 115 (3rd Cir. 2018).
“See 29 C.F.R. § 778.107 . On paper, the process for requesting overtime payments worked as follows: MLOs recorded their hours in a computerized timekeeping application.”
Pest v. Bridal Works of New York, Inc., 268 F. Supp. 3d 413 (E.D.N.Y 2017).
· cites it 2× “” 29 C.F.R, § 778.107. Under the FLSA, if an employée is not paid on an hourly basis, then “[t]he regular hourly rate of pay of an employee is determined by dividing his total remuneration for employment (except statutory exclusions), in any workweek by the total number of hours…”
Landry v. Swire Oilfield Servs., L.L.C., 252 F. Supp. 3d 1079 (D.N.M. 2017).
“See 29 C.F.R. § 778.107 (“The general overtime pay standard in section 7(a) requires that overtime must be compensated at a rate not less than one and one-half times the regular rate at which the employee is actually employed.”
Urnikis-Negro v. Am. Fam. Prop. Servs., 616 F.3d 665 (7th Cir. 2010).
“§ 207(a)(1); 29 C.F.R. § 778.107 . On the premise that her weekly salary of $1,000 was meant to compensate her solely for 40 hours of work, Urnikis-Negro contended that her regular hourly wage was $25.”
Dacar v. Saybolt, L.P., 914 F.3d 917 (5th Cir. 2018).
“, the hours exceeding 106 in a 14-day work period) by one-and-one half of their regular rate of pay.”
Bustillos v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 310 F.R.D. 631 (D.N.M. 2016).
“See 29 C.F.R. § 778.107 (“The general overtime pay standard in section 7(a) requires that overtime must be compensated at a rate not less than one and one-half times the regular rate at which the employee is actually employed.”
Edward Monroe v. FTS USA, LLC, 815 F.3d 1000 (6th Cir. 2016).
· cites it 2× “§ 207 ; 29 C.F.R. § 778.107 . In a piece-rate system, “the regular hourly rate of pay is computed by adding together total earnings for the workweek from piece rates and all other sources” and then dividing “by the number of hours worked in the week for which such compensation…”
Sillah v. Command Int'l Sec. Servises, 154 F. Supp. 3d 891 (N.D. Cal. 2015).
· cites it 2× “113 (b), if an employee’s salary, “covers a period longer than a workweek, such as a month, it must be reduced to its workweek equivalent” for purposes of calculating the employee’s hourly rate.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.