31 C.F.R. § 315.25
General
Relief, by the issue of a substitute bond or by payment, is authorized for the loss, theft, destruction, mutilation, or defacement of a bond after receipt by the owner or his or her representative. As a condition for granting relief, the Commissioner of the Fiscal Service, as designee of the Secretary of the Treasury, may require a bond of indemnity, in the form, and with the surety, or security, he considers necessary to protect the interests of the United States. In all cases the savings bond must be identified by serial number and the applicant must submit satisfactory evidence of the loss, theft, or destruction, or a satisfactory explanation of the mutilation or defacement.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1966–2019 · leading case: Laturner v. United States, 133 Fed. Cl. 47 (Fed. Cl. 2017).
Laturner v. United States, 133 Fed. Cl. 47 (Fed. Cl. 2017). “23, or pursuant to 31 C.F.R. § 315.25 , which provides a method for owners to redeem bonds where the certificates have been lost.”
Laturner v. United States, 933 F.3d 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2019). “31 C.F.R. §§ 315.25 , 315.26(a), 315.29(c).”
United States v. Ben Renfro Stuart, 22 F.3d 76 (3rd Cir. 1994). “Pursuant to 31 C.F.R. § 315.25 , the Government replaced Noel’s bonds.”
Hillel Bodek v. The Dep't of the Treasury, Bureau of the Pub. Debt, 532 F.2d 277 (2d Cir. 1976). “§ 738a 1 and 31 CFR § 315.25 . 2 We affirm the lower court’s decision for the reasons which follow.”
Lea v. United States, 132 Fed. Cl. 705 (Fed. Cl. 2017). “23, or pursuant to 31 C.F.R. § 315.25 , which provides a.method for owners to redeem bonds where the certificates have been lost.”
Estes v. United States, 123 Fed. Cl. 74 (Fed. Cl. 2015). “See 31 C.F.R. § 315.25 . In such a ease, Treasury “may require a bond of indemnity, in the form, and with the surety, or security .”
Wolak v. United States, 366 F. Supp. 1106 (D. Conn. 1973). “” 31 C.F.R. § 315.25 . 7 I doubt, and the Government does not contend, that the 1971 amendment to 31 U.”
Zelman v. United States, 893 F. Supp. 78 (D. Me. 1995). “” See 31 C.F.R. § 315.25 . Although the legislative history discussed earlier strongly suggests that Congress never intended to alter the Treasury Department’s obligation to provide relief, a court might conclude that in the context of a contract claim based on section 3125 the…”
West Philadelphia Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. United States, 256 F. Supp. 538 (E.D. Pa. 1966). “The plaintiff, however, paid part of the proceeds of the bonds to Herman Blendon outright and placed the remainder into a savings account of which he and Ida De Felice were co-tenants with right of survivorship. Ida DeFelice and later her guardian 1 took steps to have duplicate…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.