32 C.F.R. § 1905.3

General

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) No employee shall produce any materials or information in response to a demand without prior authorization as set forth in this part. This part applies to former employees to the extent consistent with applicable nondisclosure agreements.

(b) This part is intended only to provide procedures for responding to demands for production of documents or information, and is not intended to, does not, and may not be relied upon to, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable by any party against the United States.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2009–2009 · leading case: United States v. Passaro, 577 F.3d 207 (4th Cir. 2009).
United States v. Passaro, 577 F.3d 207 (4th Cir. 2009). “Passaro has failed to make any showing that the testimony of additional CIA officials would have aided his defense and, in fact, the testimony of his two superiors and the written CIA policy indicate that any additional subpoenaed witness would not have testified “in his favor.”…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.