32 C.F.R. § 202.11

Documenting RAB activities

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The installation shall document information on the activities of a RAB in the Information Repository. These activities shall include, but are not limited to:

(1) Installation's efforts to survey community interest in forming a RAB,

(2) Steps taken to establish a RAB where there is sufficient and sustained community interest,

(3) How the RAB relates to the overall community involvement program, and

(4) Steps taken to adjourn, dissolve, or reestablish the RAB.

(b) When RAB input has been used in decision-making, it should be documented as part of the Administrative Record.

[71 FR 27617, May 12, 2006; 71 FR 30719, May 30, 2006]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1983–1991 · leading case: M.N.C. Of Hinesville, Inc. v. United States Dep't of Def., 791 F.2d 1466 (11th Cir. 1986).
M.N.C. Of Hinesville, Inc. v. United States Dep't of Def., 791 F.2d 1466 (11th Cir. 1986). · cites it 3× “32 C.F.R. § 202.11 . All information given to a CEN by the military must be made available equally to any other publisher who requests it.”
Georgia Gazette Publ'g Co. v. United States Dep't of Def., 562 F. Supp. 1004 (S.D. Ga. 1983). · cites it 2× “The use of personnel with a limited understanding of technical bids (with one exception) did not provide the bidders here with the “fair and equal opportunity” mandated in 32 CFR § 202.11 (b)(1). In reaching this conclusion, I have not taken lightly the admonitions of many…”
Swarner v. United States, 937 F.2d 1478 (9th Cir. 1991). · cites it 2× “The findings of fact cite three regulations: 32 C.F.R. § 202.11 (a)(1), 12 32 C.F.R. § 297.”
Georgia Gazette Publ'g Co. v. United States Dep't of Def., 562 F. Supp. 1000 (S.D. Ga. 1983). · cites it 2× “The procedures which the defendants are required to follow in the making of contracts for civilian enterprise publications are set out in 32 C.F.R. § 202.11 (1981). 3 These regulations are deemed issued by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to 5 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.