32 C.F.R. § 210.1

Purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This part establishes policies pursuant to the requirements of DoD Directive 6055.4, 1 “Department of Defense Traffic Safety Program,” November 7, 1978, and to authority delegated to the Secretary of Defense under Enclosure 1 for the enforcement, on DoD military installations, of those state vehicular and pedestrian traffic laws that cannot be assimilated under U.S.C., Title 18, section 13.

1 Copies may be obtained, at cost, from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161.

[46 FR 58306, Dec. 1, 1981, as amended at 56 FR 13285, Apr. 1, 1991]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1985–2006 · leading case: United States v. Adams, 140 F.3d 895 (10th Cir. 1998).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Adams, 140 F.3d 895 (10th Cir. 1998). “4, “Department of Defense Traffic Safety Program,” November 7, 1978, and to authority delegated to the Secretary of Defense under Enclosure 1 for the enforcement, on DoD military installations, of those state vehicular and pedestrian traffic laws that cannot be assimilated under…”

United States v. Smith, 614 F. Supp. 454 (D. Me. 1985). “In addition, Department of Defense Regulations, 32 C.F.R. § 210.1 , et seq., provide that state vehicular laws be adopted and made applicable on military installations.”

United States v. Brooks, 64 M.J. 587 (A.C.C.A. 2006). “See also 32 C.F.R. §§ 210.1 and 210.2 (“Purpose ..”

Auth. for Military Police to Issue Traffic Citations to Motorists on Bolling Air Force Base (OLC 2000). “See 32 C.F.R. §210.1 . The directive mandates that “ [a]ll persons on a military installation shall comply with the vehicular and pedestrian traffic laws of the state in which the installation is located,” 32 C.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.