32 C.F.R. § 516.1
Purpose
(a) This part prescribes policies and procedures for the following:
(1) Defensive and affirmative litigation in Federal and state civilian courts where the Army or DOD has an interest in the matter.
(2) Proceedings before Federal or state administrative bodies, such as utility rate commissions.
(3) Release of official information and testimony by DA personnel with regard to litigation.
(4) Remedies for procurement fraud and corruption.
(5) Environmental civil litigation and administrative proceedings.
(6) Proceedings before the Office of Special Counsel.
(b) This regulation does not apply to DA or DOD proceedings such as courts-martial or administrative boards.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1982–1993 · leading case: Lamont v. Haig, 539 F. Supp. 552 (D.S.D. 1982).
Lamont v. Haig, 539 F. Supp. 552 (D.S.D. 1982). “Service on Military Defendants under 32 C.F.R. § 516.1 (e)(2). Plaintiffs were unable to obtain direct personal service upon defendants Gleszer, Edwards, Hay and Haig, who were all either active or retired military personnel at the time the original complaint was filed in 1975.”
United States ex rel. Treat Bros. v. Fid. & Deposit Co., 986 F.2d 1110 (7th Cir. 1993). “10350-01 (1990) (codified at 32 C.F.R. § 516.1 et seq.). None of these goals is intended to benefit private litigants.”
— 32 C.F.R. § 516.1(e) — 1 case
Lamont v. Haig, 539 F. Supp. 552 (D.S.D. 1982). “Service on Military Defendants under 32 C.F.R. § 516.1 (e)(2). Plaintiffs were unable to obtain direct personal service upon defendants Gleszer, Edwards, Hay and Haig, who were all either active or retired military personnel at the time the original complaint was filed in 1975.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.