32 C.F.R. § 516.14

Service of process on DA or Secretary of Army

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The Chief, Litigation Division, shall accept service of process for Department of the Army or for the Secretary of the Army in his official capacity.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2019–2023 · leading case: Johnson v. Wormuth (W.D. Tex. 2022).
Johnson v. Wormuth (W.D. Tex. 2022). · cites it 2× “The chief of the Army Litigation Division accepts service of process on the Secretary of the Army pursuant to 32 C.F.R. § 516.14 , which states: “The Chief, Litigation Division, shall accept service of process for Department of the Army or for the Secretary of the Army in his…”
Hawkins v. McCarthy (N.D. Ala. 2019). “” 32 CFR § 516.14 . Defendants state the current Chief of the Army’s Litigation Division is Colonel Michael D.”
Smith v. Wormuth (D. Maryland 2021). “Under 32 C.F.R. § 516.14 , “[t]he Chief, Litigation Division, shall accept service of process … for the Secretary of the Army in his official capacity.”
Mekonen v. Wormuth (W.D. Tex. 2023). “See 32 C.F.R. § 516.14 . This order warned Plaintiff that if he still fails to serve Defendant under Rule 4(i) by July 14, 2023, the Court will dismiss this case for want of prosecution.”
Mekonen v. Wormuth (W.D. Tex. 2023). “This order was even more explicit, directing Plaintiff to request issuance of summons and send a copy of the summons and Complaint via registered or certified mail to specific parties pursuant to 32 C.F.R. § 516.14 . This order warned Plaintiff that failure to serve Defendant…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.