(a) Whenever the authority of § 1.5(a) is invoked to restrict or control a public use or activity, to relax or revoke an existing restriction or control, to designate all or a portion of a park area as open or closed, or to require a permit to implement a public use limit, the public shall be notified by one or more of the following methods:
(1) Signs posted at conspicuous locations, such as normal points of entry and reasonable intervals along the boundary of the affected park locale.
(2) Maps available in the office of the superintendent and other places convenient to the public.
(3) Publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the affected area.
(4) Other appropriate methods, such as the removal of closure signs, use of electronic media, park brochures, maps and handouts.
(b) In addition to the above-described notification procedures, the superintendent shall compile in writing all the designations, closures, permit requirements and other restrictions imposed under discretionary authority. This compilation shall be updated annually and made available to the public upon request.
Notes of Decisions
Mashack v. Jewell, 149 F. Supp. 3d 11 (D.D.C. 2016).
· cites it 3× “Plaintiffs also allege in the amended complaint that the Park Service failed to comply with 36 C.F.R. § 1.7 , Am. Compl. ¶ 85, but they do not elaborate further on that contention.”
Pers. Watercraft Coalition v. Marin Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, 122 Cal. Rptr. 2d 425 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002).
“Of particular note were the prohibitions of jurisdictions adjacent to, and in some cases including parts of, the Marin coastline—San Francisco, Sausalito, the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, the Point Reyes National Seashore ( 36 C.F.R. § 1.7 (b) (2001) Compendium), the…”
Voyageurs Nat'l Park Ass'n v. Norton, 381 F.3d 759 (8th Cir. 2004).
“5(c) and 36 C.F.R. § 1.7 . The § 1.5(c) procedures require the park superintendent to prepare a written determination justifying the decision, and §1.”
United States v. Knauer, 635 F. Supp. 2d 203 (E.D.N.Y 2009).
“There is no evidence as to whether the Superintendent's Compendium was posted on the National Park Service's ("NPS'') website on May 29, 2007.”
United States v. Knauer, 707 F. Supp. 2d 379 (E.D.N.Y 2010).
· cites it 3× “36 C.F.R. § 1.7 (a). See also 36 C.F.R. § 1.”
Ft. Funston Dog Walkers v. Babbitt, 96 F. Supp. 2d 1021 (N.D. Cal. 2000).
“It also documents the public notice required under 36 CFR section 1.7 in support of the closure” (ibid.”
United States v. Lofton (4th Cir. 2000).
· cites it 3× “2 Lofton, however, contends that 36 C.F.R. § 1.7 requires that notice of the weapons ban must be provided.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.