36 C.F.R. § 294.11

Definition

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Inventoried roadless areas—Areas identified in a set of inventoried roadless area maps, contained in the Forest Service Roadless Area Conservation, Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume 2, dated November 2000, and any subsequent update or revision of those maps through the land management planning process.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2003–2023 · leading case: Los Padres Forestwatch v. Usfs, 25 F.4th 649 (9th Cir. 2022).
Los Padres Forestwatch v. Usfs, 25 F.4th 649 (9th Cir. 2022). · cites it 6× “Twenty-four miles long and three miles wide, it lies both north of and adjacent to the San Andreas Rift Zone.”
Wyoming v. United States Dep't of Agric., 661 F.3d 1209 (10th Cir. 2011). · cites it 2× “at 3272 (to be codified at 36 C.F.R. § 294.11 ) — to be maintained. Id.”
Hammond v. Norton, 370 F. Supp. 2d 226 (D.D.C. 2005). · cites it 2× “See 36 C.F.R. § 294.11 . USFS regulations prohibit (with certain exceptions not at issue here) the construction of roads in such “inventoried roadless areas.”
Wilderness Workshop v. United States Bureau of Land Mgmt., 531 F.3d 1220 (10th Cir. 2008). “3272 (originally at 36 C.F.R. § 294.11 ). Defendants, in issuing the ROD in this case, concluded there would be no violation of the Roadless Rule because the proposed pipeline could “be built within IRA’s without road construction.”
Wyoming v. United States Dep't of Agric., 277 F. Supp. 2d 1197 (D. Wyo. 2003). “The Forest Service did not define what constitutes “small diameter timber,” see 36 C.F.R. § 294.11 , nor did it explain its reasoning for this change.”
Wyoming v. United States Dep't of Agric., 570 F. Supp. 2d 1309 (D. Wyo. 2008). “The Forest Service did not define what constitutes “small diameter timber,” see 36 C.F.R. § 294.11 , nor did it explain its reasoning for this change.”
Hogback Basin Pres. Ass'n v. United States Forest Serv., 577 F. Supp. 2d 1139 (W.D. Wash. 2008). · cites it 3× “36 C.F.R. § 294.11 (2001). Thus, the Roadless Rule’s specific exemptions for road and timber projects largely involve preexisting contracts or decisions; the satisfaction of legal or treaty rights; and environmental preservation, public safety, or the public interest.”
W. Watersheds Proj. v. Perdue (D. Ariz. 2023). “24 12, 2001); see also 36 C.F.R. § 294.11 . Absent certain exceptions, the Roadless Rule 25 “prohibits road construction [and] reconstruction .”
All. for the Wild Rockies v. Munoz (D. Mont. 2022). “The Forest Service designates Inventoried Roadless Areas (“IRAs”) pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 294.11 . Id. The Roadless Area Conservation Rule (“the Roadless Rule”), promulgated by the Department of Agriculture in 2001, controls the circumstances under which cutting IRA timber is…”
Native Ecosystems Council v. Lannom (D. Mont. 2022). “See 36 C.F.R. § 294.11 (2005) (defining the roadless area characteristics).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.