40 C.F.R. § 280.60
General
Owners and operators of petroleum or hazardous substance UST systems must, in response to a confirmed release from the UST system, comply with the requirements of this subpart except for USTs excluded under § 280.10(b) and UST systems subject to RCRA Subtitle C corrective action requirements under section 3004(u) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1991–2021 · leading case: Albany Bank & Trust Company, Not Individually, but Solely as Trustee Under Trust No. 11-4067 v. Exxon Mobil Corporation
Albany Bank & Trust Company, Not Individually, but Solely as Trustee Under Trust No. 11-4067 v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2002)
“40 C.F.R. §§ 280.60 -.67. These provisions require that releases first be investigated and that responsible parties next submit corrective action plans.”
Dydio v. Hesston Corp. (1995)
“40 C.F.R. §§ 280.60 -.67. Section 280.60 of Title 40 provides: “Owners and operators of petroleum .”
Raymond K. Hoxsie Real Estate Trust v. Exxon Education Foundation (2000)
“Therefore, since an owner “must, in response to a confirmed release from the UST system, comply with the requirements of [Subpart F,]” 40 C.F.R. § 280.60 (1999), the Exxon defendants can currently be in violation of RCRA by failing to remediate, as dictated by the regulations,…”
United States v. Ownbey Enterprises, Inc. (1991)
“§ 6991b(h); 40 C.F.R. §§ 280.60 — .67 (1990). The EPA’s authority to require a corrective action plan, as was issued in this case, comes from 40 C.”
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Robert E. Hill (2021)
“” 40 C.F.R. § 280.60 . Subpart F imposes several different 8 requirements, including initial response, initial abatement measures, initial site characterization, 9 free product removal, soil and ground water cleanup, and a corrective action plan.”
Albany Bank & Trust v. Exxon Mobil Corp (2002)
“40 C.F.R. §§ 280.60 -.67. These provisions require that releases first be investigated and that responsible parties next submit corrective action plans.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.