C.F.R. » Title 40 » CHAPTER I—ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY › SUBCHAPTER J—SUPERFUND, EMERGENCY PLANNING, AND COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW PROGRAMS › PART 300—NATIONAL OIL AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES POLLUTION CONTINGENCY PLAN › Subpart A—Introduction

40 C.F.R. § 300.1

Purpose and objectives

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The purpose of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) is to provide the organizational structure and procedures for preparing for and responding to discharges of oil and releases of hazardous substances, pollutants, and contaminants.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 65 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1985–2023 · leading case: Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Alcoa Global Fasteners, Inc., 219 Cal. Rptr. 3d 474 (Cal. Ct. App. 5th 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Alcoa Global Fasteners, Inc., 219 Cal. Rptr. 3d 474 (Cal. Ct. App. 5th 2017). · cites it 2× “( 40 C.F.R. § 300.1 et seq. ) Under the NCP, the primary objective of a feasibility study is "to ensure that appropriate remedial alternatives are developed and evaluated such that relevant information concerning the remedial action options can be presented to a decision-maker…”
Artesian Water Co. v. Gov't of New Castle Cnty., 659 F. Supp. 1269 (D. Del. 1987). · cites it 3× “(July 16, 1982); 40 C.F.R. §§ 300.1 et seq. (1985). Prior to publication of the 1982 NCP, the applicable plan was that promulgated pursuant to section 311(c) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (“FWPCA”), 33 U.”
State of California, on Behalf of the California Dep't of Toxic Substances Control v. Neville Chem. Co., a Corp., 358 F.3d 661 (9th Cir. 2004). · cites it 2× “” 40 C.F.R. § 300.1 . See also Wash. St. Dep’t of Transp.”
Bernstein v. Bankert, 733 F.3d 190 (7th Cir. 2012). “2d 548 (2004)); see also 40 C.F.R. § 300.1 et seq. . One could reasonably conclude, based solely on the physical structure of § 9613(f), that § 9613(f)(3)(B) does not create a distinct, second cause of action for contribution, instead simply modifying or further describing the…”
Nl Indus., Inc. v. Stuart M. Kaplan, 792 F.2d 896 (9th Cir. 1986). “We agree with NL Industries that we should look to the national contingency plan that was in effect at the time that Kaplan allegedly incurred response costs, see 40 C.F.R. §§ 300.1 -.86 (1985), rather than to the current version, see 50 Fed.”
Vill. of DePue, Ill. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 537 F.3d 775 (7th Cir. 2008). “CERCLA is connected to the National Priorities List (“NPL”) and the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (“NCP”), 40 C.F.R. § 300.1 et seq. CERCLA requires the EPA to maintain the NPL, which is intended primarily to guide the EPA in determining which…”
Wickland Oil Terminals, a California Corp. v. Asarco, Inc., a New Jersey Corp., & State Lands Comm'n of California, 792 F.2d 887 (9th Cir. 1986). “42,237 (1981), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued in 1982 the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (the 1982 national contingency plan), 40 C.F.R. §§ 300.1 -.86 (1985). 1 One subpart of the 1982 national contingency plan addresses…”
Young v. United States, 394 F.3d 858 (10th Cir. 2005). “§ 9605 (a); see also 40 C.F.R. §§ 300.1 , 300.3. A response cost must be “necessary to the containment and cleanup of hazardous releases.”
Dedham Water Co. & Dedham-Westwood Water Dist. v. Cumberland Farms Dairy, Inc., 889 F.2d 1146 (1st Cir. 1989). “The NCP, 40 C.F.R. § 300.1 et seq., prepared by the Environmental Protection Agency, states: (a)(1) Any person may undertake a response action to reduce or eliminate the release or threat of release of hazardous substances_ [Section 9607] of CERC-LA authorizes persons to recover…”
United States v. Ward, 618 F. Supp. 884 (E.D.N.C. 1985). “§ 9604 (a)(1) (1982); 40 C.F.R. § 300.1 et seq. (1983). Those sites in most urgent need of governmental response are included in a “national priorities list” which identifies priority sites for Superfund-financed remedial action.”
Housatonic River Initiative v. U.S. Env't Prot. Agency, 75 F.4th 248 (1st Cir. 2023). “See 40 C.F.R. § 300.1 et seq. B. Factual Background 1.”
State of Ohio v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 997 F.2d 1520 (D.C. Cir. 1993). “40 C.F.R. § 300.1 . It is the means by which EPA implements CERCLA.”
Show all 65 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.