40 C.F.R. § 412.4

Best management practices (BMPs) for land application of manure, litter, and process wastewater

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Applicability. This section applies to any CAFO subject to subpart C of this part (Dairy and Beef Cattle other than Veal Calves) or subpart D of this part (Swine, Poultry, and Veal Calves).

(b) Specialized definitions. (1) Setback means a specified distance from surface waters or potential conduits to surface waters where manure, litter, and process wastewater may not be land applied. Examples of conduits to surface waters include but are not limited to: Open tile line intake structures, sinkholes, and agricultural well heads.

(2) Vegetated buffer means a narrow, permanent strip of dense perennial vegetation established parallel to the contours of and perpendicular to the dominant slope of the field for the purposes of slowing water runoff, enhancing water infiltration, and minimizing the risk of any potential nutrients or pollutants from leaving the field and reaching surface waters.

(3) Multi-year phosphorus application means phosphorus applied to a field in excess of the crop needs for that year. In multi-year phosphorus applications, no additional manure, litter, or process wastewater is applied to the same land in subsequent years until the applied phosphorus has been removed from the field via harvest and crop removal.

(c) Requirement to develop and implement best management practices. Each CAFO subject to this section that land applies manure, litter, or process wastewater, must do so in accordance with the following practices:

(1) Nutrient Management Plan. The CAFO must develop and implement a nutrient management plan that incorporates the requirements of paragraphs (c)(2) through (c)(5) of this section based on a field-specific assessment of the potential for nitrogen and phosphorus transport from the field and that addresses the form, source, amount, timing, and method of application of nutrients on each field to achieve realistic production goals, while minimizing nitrogen and phosphorus movement to surface waters.

(2) Determination of application rates. Application rates for manure, litter, and other process wastewater applied to land under the ownership or operational control of the CAFO must minimize phosphorus and nitrogen transport from the field to surface waters in compliance with the technical standards for nutrient management established by the Director. Such technical standards for nutrient management shall:

(i) Include a field-specific assessment of the potential for nitrogen and phosphorus transport from the field to surface waters, and address the form, source, amount, timing, and method of application of nutrients on each field to achieve realistic production goals, while minimizing nitrogen and phosphorus movement to surface waters; and

(ii) Include appropriate flexibilities for any CAFO to implement nutrient management practices to comply with the technical standards, including consideration of multi-year phosphorus application on fields that do not have a high potential for phosphorus runoff to surface water, phased implementation of phosphorus-based nutrient management, and other components, as determined appropriate by the Director.

(3) Manure and soil sampling. Manure must be analyzed a minimum of once annually for nitrogen and phosphorus content, and soil analyzed a minimum of once every five years for phosphorus content. The results of these analyses are to be used in determining application rates for manure, litter, and other process wastewater.

(4) Inspect land application equipment for leaks. The operator must periodically inspect equipment used for land application of manure, litter, or process wastewater.

(5) Setback requirements. Unless the CAFO exercises one of the compliance alternatives provided for in paragraph (c)(5)(i) or (c)(5)(ii) of this section, manure, litter, and process wastewater may not be applied closer than 100 feet to any down-gradient surface waters, open tile line intake structures, sinkholes, agricultural well heads, or other conduits to surface waters.

(i) Vegetated buffer compliance alternative. As a compliance alternative, the CAFO may substitute the 100-foot setback with a 35-foot wide vegetated buffer where applications of manure, litter, or process wastewater are prohibited.

(ii) Alternative practices compliance alternative. As a compliance alternative, the CAFO may demonstrate that a setback or buffer is not necessary because implementation of alternative conservation practices or field-specific conditions will provide pollutant reductions equivalent or better than the reductions that would be achieved by the 100-foot setback.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2005–2024 · leading case: Sierra Club MacKinac Chapter v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 747 N.W.2d 321 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008).
Sierra Club MacKinac Chapter v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 747 N.W.2d 321 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 4× “'" [53] 40 CFR 412.4(c)(1) provides that a nutrient management plan developed by a CAFO must incorporate the following: Application rates for manure, litter, and other process wastewater applied to land under the ownership or operational control of the CAFO must minimize…”
Waterkeeper All., Inc. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 399 F.3d 486 (2d Cir. 2005). · cites it 13× “” 40 C.F.R. § 412.4 (c)(2). (3) The Discharges Subject to NPDES Requirements The Rule provides, in § 122.”
Dept. of Env. v. Assateague Coastal Trust, 299 A.3d 619 (Md. 2023). “40 C.F.R. § 412.4 (c); EN § 9-326. BMPs are defined as “schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices to prevent or reduce the pollution of ‘waters of the United States.”
Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc. v. New York State Dep't of Env't Conservation, 35 Misc. 3d 652 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2012). “Pursuant to 40 CFR 412.4 (c) (2), NMPs must “include ‘application rates’ that ‘minimize phosphorous and nitrogen transport from the field to surface waters in compliance with the technical standards for nutrient management established by the [EPA].”
Michigan Farm Bureau v. Dept of Env't Great Lakes & Energy (Mich. 2024). · cites it 5× “42(e) (2023); 40 CFR 412.4(c) (2023). Relevant here, one of the best- management practices prohibits CAFOs from applying manure and wastewater closer than 100 feet to any surface waters or potential conduits to surface waters unless a CAFO puts a 35-foot-wide “vegetated buffer”…”
Snake River Waterkeeper v. J.R. Simplot Co. (D. Idaho 2024). “40 C.F.R. § 412.4 (c)(1). As SRW highlights, Simplot is aware of this requirement since it previously held a NPDES permit for discharges from the Grand View Facility.”
— 40 C.F.R. § 412.4(c) — 1 case
Michigan Farm Bureau v. Dept of Env't Great Lakes & Energy (Mich. 2024). “42(e) (2023); 40 CFR 412.4(c) (2023). Relevant here, one of the best- management practices prohibits CAFOs from applying manure and wastewater closer than 100 feet to any surface waters or potential conduits to surface waters unless a CAFO puts a 35-foot-wide “vegetated buffer”…”
— 40 C.F.R. § 412.4(c)(1) — 1 case
Sierra Club MacKinac Chapter v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 747 N.W.2d 321 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). “'" [53] 40 CFR 412.4(c)(1) provides that a nutrient management plan developed by a CAFO must incorporate the following: Application rates for manure, litter, and other process wastewater applied to land under the ownership or operational control of the CAFO must minimize…”
— 40 C.F.R. § 412.4(c)(2) — 1 case
Sierra Club MacKinac Chapter v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 747 N.W.2d 321 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). “'" [53] 40 CFR 412.4(c)(1) provides that a nutrient management plan developed by a CAFO must incorporate the following: Application rates for manure, litter, and other process wastewater applied to land under the ownership or operational control of the CAFO must minimize…”
— 40 C.F.R. § 412.4(c)(5)(i) — 1 case
Michigan Farm Bureau v. Dept of Env't Great Lakes & Energy (Mich. 2024). “42(e) (2023); 40 CFR 412.4(c) (2023). Relevant here, one of the best- management practices prohibits CAFOs from applying manure and wastewater closer than 100 feet to any surface waters or potential conduits to surface waters unless a CAFO puts a 35-foot-wide “vegetated buffer”…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.