40 C.F.R. § 85.1504

Conditional admission

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A motor vehicle or motor vehicle engine offered for importation under § 85.1505, § 85.1509 or § 85.1512 may be conditionally admitted into the United States, but shall be refused final admission unless:

(1) At the time of conditional admission, the importer has submitted to the Administrator a written report that the subject vehicle or engine has been permitted conditional admission pending EPA approval of its application for final admission under § 85.1505, § 85.1509, or § 85.1512. This written report shall contain the following:

(i) Identification of the importer of the vehicle or engine and the importer's address and telephone number;

(ii) Identification of the vehicle or engine owner and the vehicle or engine owner's address, telephone number and taxpayer identification number;

(iii) Identification of the vehicle or engine;

(iv) Information indicating under what provision of these regulations the vehicle or engine is to be imported;

(v) Identification of the place where the subject vehicle or engine will be stored until EPA approval of the importer's application to the Administrator for final admission;

(vi) Authorization for EPA Enforcement Officers to conduct inspections or testing otherwise permitted by the Act or regulations thereunder;

(vii) Identification, where applicable, of the certificate by means of which the vehicle is being imported;

(viii) The original production year of the vehicle; and

(ix) Such other information as is deemed necessary by the Administrator.

(b) Such conditional admission shall not be under bond for a vehicle or engine which is imported under § 85.1505 or § 85.1509. A bond will be required for a vehicle or engine imported under applicable provisions of § 85.1512. The period of conditional admission shall not exceed 120 days. During this period, the importer shall store the vehicle or engine at a location where the Administrator will have reasonable access to the vehicle or engine for his/her inspection.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1984–1988 · leading case: Anderson Shipping Co. v. Env't Prot. Agency, Lee M. Thomas, Adm'r, & United States of Am., 852 F.2d 1387 (D.C. Cir. 1988).
Anderson Shipping Co. v. Env't Prot. Agency, Lee M. Thomas, Adm'r, & United States of Am., 852 F.2d 1387 (D.C. Cir. 1988). “40 C.F.R. § 85.1504 (1985). Those regulations permitted any person to import nonconforming vehicles provided they were modified according to the conformity regulations.”
Sims v. Florida, Dep't of High. Saf. & Motor Vehs., 832 F.2d 1558 (11th Cir. 1987). · cites it 3× “12 40 C.F.R. § 85.1504 (a) (1986). The EPA then sends the importer a “Dear Importer” letter, which informs him of the methods by which he can comply with the requirements of the EPA’s import regulations.”
DiGiorgio v. United States, 8 Ct. Int'l Trade 192 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1984). · cites it 2× “80(b)(l)(iii); 40 C.F.R. § 85.1504 . In addition, plaintiff was required to submit a surety *193 bond in connection with the entry.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.