42 C.F.R. § 430.0
Program description
Title XIX of the Social Security Act, enacted in 1965, authorizes Federal grants to States for medical assistance to low-income persons who are age 65 or over, blind, disabled, or members of families with dependent children or qualified pregnant women or children. The program is jointly financed by the Federal and State governments and administered by States. Within broad Federal rules, each State decides eligible groups, types and range of services, payment levels for services, and administrative and operating procedures. Payments for services are made directly by the State to the individuals or entities that furnish the services.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 134
cases (9 in the last 5 years), 1983–2026 · leading case: Martin Ex Rel. Hoff v. City of Rochester, 642 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 2002).
Martin Ex Rel. Hoff v. City of Rochester, 642 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 2002). “42 C.F.R. § 430.0 ; see Norwest Bank of N.”
Bynum v. Magno, 101 P.3d 1149 (Haw. 2004). “§§ 1396 et seq (1973) (hereinafter the Medicaid Act); 42 C.F.R § 430.0 (2004); Children's Hosp.”
M.R. v. Dreyfus, 697 F.3d 706 (9th Cir. 2011). “438, 444 (1977); 42 C.F.R. § 430.0 . States may, but need not, choose to subsidize other types of medical services, including “personal care services,” the ben- efit at issue here.”
Phoenix Mem'l Hosp. v. Sebelius, 622 F.3d 1219 (9th Cir. 2010). “; 42 C.F.R. § 430.0 . The program is jointly financed by the federal and state governments, and states administer the program according to federal guidelines.”
California Ass'n of Rural Health Clinics v. Douglas, 738 F.3d 1007 (9th Cir. 2013). “§ 1396a; 42 C.F.R. § 430.0 . States, are not required to participate in Medicaid, but those states that opt in to the system must comply with both the statutory requirements imposed by Medicaid and with regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Health and Human Services.”
Long Term Care Pharmacy All. v. Ferguson, 362 F.3d 50 (1st Cir. 2004). “42 C.F.R. § 430.0 (2002). Under the Medicaid Act, which is Title XIX of the Social Security Act, 42 U.”
M.R. v. Dreyfus, 663 F.3d 1100 (9th Cir. 2011). “438, 444 (1977); 42 C.F.R. § 430.0 . States may, but need not, choose to subsidize other types of medical services, including “personal care services,” the benefit at issue here.”
Angela Ruckh v. Salus Rehab., LLC, 963 F.3d 1089 (11th Cir. 2020). “42 C.F.R. § 430.0 . States pay service providers directly, subject to broad federal rules, and receive partial reimbursement from the federal government for their Medicaid expenses.”
California Ass'n for Health Serv. at Home v. State Dep't of Health Servs., 2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2822 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007). “(Ibid,; 42 C.F.R. § 430.0 (2005).) To receive matching federal funding, states must agree to comply with the applicable Medicaid law.”
Grey Bear v. North Dakota Dep't of Human Servs., 2002 ND 139 (N.D. 2002). “See 42 C.F.R. § 430.0 ; see also Krueger Estate v.”
United States Ex Rel. Feldman v. City of New York, 808 F. Supp. 2d 641 (S.D.N.Y. 2011). “See 42 C.F.R. §§ 430.0 et seq. The federal government then makes quarterly grants to each such State to reimburse the State for the federal share of Medicaid expenditures.”
El Paso Hosp. Dist. v. Texas Health & Human Servs. Comm'n, 247 S.W.3d 709 (Tex. 2008). “Once the plan is approved by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the state is responsible for operating the program to conform with the federal guidelines.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.