C.F.R. » Title 42 » CHAPTER IV—CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES › SUBCHAPTER C—MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS › PART 435—ELIGIBILITY IN THE STATES, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS, AND AMERICAN SAMOA › Subpart D—Optional Coverage of the Medically Needy

42 C.F.R. § 435.300

Scope

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This subpart specifies the option for coverage of medically needy individuals.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1980–2021 · leading case: Hines v. Dep't of Pub. Aid, 850 N.E.2d 148 (Ill. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hines v. Dep't of Pub. Aid, 850 N.E.2d 148 (Ill. 2006). “See 305 ILCS 5/5 — 2(2) (West 2002); 42 C.F.R. § 435.300 et seq. (2003). People who fall into the second category are called MANG (Medical Assistance-No Grant) recipients.”
Herweg v. Ray, 455 U.S. 265 (1983). “§ 1396a(a)(10)(C); 42 CFR §§ 435.300 - 435.325, 435.800-435.”
Gillmore v. Illinois Dep't of Human Servs., 843 N.E.2d 336 (Ill. 2006). “See 305 ILCS 5/5 — 2(2) (West 2002); 42 C.F.R. § 435.300 et seq. (2003). People who fall into the second category are called MANG (Medical Assistance — No Grant) recipients.”
Clark v. Comm'r of Income Maint., 551 A.2d 729 (Conn. 1988). “§ 1396a (a) (10) (C); 42 C.F.R. §§ 435.300 through 435.340. Connecticut has elected to cover the “optionally categorically needy” and the “medically needy,” as well as the “categorically needy.”
Skindzier v. Comm'r of Soc. Servs., 784 A.2d 323 (Conn. 2001). “§ 1396a (a) (10) (C); 42 C.F.R. §§ 435.300 through 435.350. “Contrary to what the term implies, a finding of a medicaid qualifying trust makes one ineligible for medicaid benefits.”
Ahern v. Thomas, 733 A.2d 756 (Conn. 1999). “§ 1396a (a) (10) (C); 42 C.F.R. §§ 435.300 through 435.350. “Contrary to what the term implies, a finding of a 'medicaid qualifying trust’ makes one ineligible for medicaid benefits.”
Ross v. Giardi, 680 A.2d 113 (Conn. 1996). “§ 1396a (a) (10) (C); 42 C.F.R. § 435.300 et seq. These statutes and regulations limit the ability of a state that chooses to conduct a medically needy program to establish whatever requirements it prefers.”
Matarazzo v. Rowe, 623 A.2d 470 (Conn. 1993). “Connecticut, at its option, has chosen to provide medicaid benefits to the medically needy: “those whose resources [or incomes] are sufficient to cover their ordinary living expenses, but not their medical care.”
Gillmore v. Illinois Dep't of Human Servs. Modified Upon Denial of Rehearing, 822 N.E.2d 882 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). “170 (2003)) and (2) the “medically needy,” who have incomes too high to qualify for cash-welfare payments but low enough to qualify for medical assistance (305 ILCS 5/5—2(2) (West 2002); 42 C.F.R. §§ 435.300 through 435.350 (2003)).”
Newton-Nations v. Betlach, 660 F.3d 370 (9th Cir. 2011). “In 42 C.F.R. § 435.300 et seq., the Secretary “specifies the option for coverage of medically needy individuals.”
State of New Jersey v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 670 F.2d 1284 (3rd Cir. 1982). “) (emphasis added) (current version at 42 C.F.R. §§ 435.300 -.325). Thus, for example, a state that provided Medicaid assistance to “categorically needy” persons participating in the Old Age Assistance and the Aid to the Blind programs could not include in its plan the…”
Granito v. Sunn, 594 F. Supp. 410 (D. Haw. 1984). · cites it 3× “lump-sum rule to deny Medicaid benefits imposes an eligibility requirement not provided for under federal law, in violation of 42 C.F.R. § 435.300 to § 435.340 (1983), the regulatory basis for the medically-needy program, 42 C.”
Show all 20 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.