C.F.R. » Title 42 » CHAPTER IV—CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES › SUBCHAPTER C—MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS › PART 435—ELIGIBILITY IN THE STATES, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS, AND AMERICAN SAMOA › Subpart J—Eligibility in the States and District of Columbia

42 C.F.R. § 435.906

Opportunity to apply

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The agency must afford an individual wishing to do so the opportunity to apply for Medicaid without delay.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1991–2025 · leading case: Reynolds v. Giuliani, 506 F.3d 183 (2d Cir. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Reynolds v. Giuliani, 506 F.3d 183 (2d Cir. 2007). · cites it 2× “§ 1396a(a)(8) (2003); 42 C.F.R. §§ 435.906 , 435.913 (2006), such determinations were made infrequently.”
McMillan v. McCrimon, 807 F. Supp. 475 (C.D. Ill. 1992). · cites it 3× “Section 1396a(a)(8) and 42 C.F.R. Section 435.906. In addition, the plaintiffs claim that the State is violating their rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
King Ex Rel. King v. Sullivan, 776 F. Supp. 645 (D.R.I. 1991). “42 C.F.R. § 435.906 (1990). The agency must also: [fjurnish Medicaid promptly to recipients without any delay caused by the agency’s administrative procedures.”
Wellington v. Dist. of Columbia, 851 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1994). “Claim III—Acceptance of Applications Plaintiffs claim that the District’s welfare'system has unlawfully failed to accept applications in certain instances. Claim III of the amended complaint is based on 42 U.”
Rosen v. Tennessee Comm'r of Fin. & Admin., 280 F. Supp. 2d 743 (M.D. Tenn. 2002). “911 (e); • The Defendant’s imposition of multiple applications for eligibility requirements violates federal policy that requires the state to consider all grounds for an enrollee’s eligibility, citing 42 C.F.R. §§ 435.906 and 435.930(a); • The Defendant’s requirement that…”
Linda D. Tanner v. Texas Health & Human Servs. Comm'n, Julia Murray, Wendy Proctor, & Juan Rodriguez (Tex. App. 2025). · cites it 4× “2 , 1 TAC 366.307 ; 366.507; 366.611 ; 366.”
Linda D. Tanner v. Texas Health & Human Servs. Comm'n, Julia Murray, Wendy Proctor, & Juan Rodriguez (Tex. App. 2025). “803, 42 CFR 435.906) Form TF0001 Page 2 of 3 04/2023 TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES P O BOX 149029 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78714-9029 Date: 05/06/2021 Need help? Case Number: Your text here 85 1000212693 Call 2 -1-1 or 1-877-541-7905 If you have a hearing or speech disability, call 7-1-1…”
Reynolds v. DeBuono (2d Cir. 2007). “§ 1396a(a)(8) (2003); 42 C.F.R. §§ 435.906 , 435.913 20 (2006), such determinations were made infrequently.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.