(a) When the bureau informs you of its decision to comply with a request by granting, partially granting, or denying the request, it will do so in writing and in accordance with the deadlines in subpart D of this part. The bureau's written response will include a statement about the services offered by the FOIA Public Liaison. The bureau's written response will also include a statement about the services offered by OGIS, using standard language that can be found at: https://www.doi.gov/foia/news/guidance.”
(b) If the bureau determines that your request will take longer than 10 workdays to process, the bureau immediately will send you a written acknowledgment that includes the request's individualized tracking number and processing track (see § 2.15(e)). The acknowledgement may also include a brief description of the subject of your request.
[77 FR 76902, Dec. 31, 2012, as amended at 81 FR 11129, Mar. 3, 2016; 81 FR 92694, Dec. 20, 2016; 84 FR 61828, Nov. 14, 2019]
Notes of Decisions
Edmonds Inst. v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 383 F. Supp. 2d 105 (D.D.C. 2005).
“” 43 C.F.R. § 2.21 . The DOI has submitted a declaration from an official at the NPS averring that the search for documents in this case began no later than December 31, 2002.”
Stewart v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 554 F.3d 1236 (10th Cir. 2009).
“§ 552 (a)(8)(C); 43 C.F.R. § 2.21 (a). As the Counties explain, the data on backup tapes is not organized for retrieval of individual documents or files, but rather for purposes of disaster recovery.”
Nielsen v. United States Bureau of Land Mgmt., 252 F.R.D. 499 (D. Minnesota 2008).
“” 43 C.F.R. § 2.21 (a). The search for items 3 and 4 was begun sometime after January 17, 2007, the date that plaintiff wrote to Gbneou at the direction of Brown requesting the documents responsive to items 3 and 4, and shortly after January 23, 2007, when Gbneou left.”
Oregon Nat. Desert Ass'n v. United States Dep't of Interior, 24 F. Supp. 2d 1088 (D. Or. 1998).
· cites it 2× “DOI’s fee waiver regulations are set out in 43 C.F.R. § 2.21 . The regulations provide a three prong analysis in determining whether the information will significantly contribute to public understanding of governmental activities: (I) Does the record concern the operation or…”
Friends of Coast Fork v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 110 F.3d 53 (9th Cir. 1997).
“43 C.F.R. § 2.21 (a)(2). One factor of this test is whether the requested materials are publicly accessible in an Interior Department reading room; if so, the regulations specify that disclosure is unlikely to contribute significantly to public understanding.”
Inst. for Wildlife Prot. v. United States Fish & Wildlife Serv., 290 F. Supp. 2d 1226 (D. Or. 2003).
· cites it 2× “The Department of the Interior issued fee waiver guidance, which is found at 43 C.F.R. § 2.21 . The DOI’s fee waiver regulations provide that, “[r]ecords developed outside of the government and submitted to or obtained by the Department may relate to the operations and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.