43 C.F.R. § 2.22
How will the bureau grant requests?
(a) Once the bureau makes a determination to grant a request in full or in part, it must notify you in writing.
(b) The notification will inform you of any fees charged under subpart G of this part.
(c) The bureau will release records (or portions of records) to you promptly upon payment of any applicable fees (or before then, at its discretion).
(d) If the records (or portions of records) are not included with the bureau's notification, the bureau will advise you how, when, and where the records will be released or made available.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2004–2021 · leading case: Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 314 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2004).
Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 314 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2004). “” 43 C.F.R. § 2.22 (a)(1). Other DOI offices were involved in looking into ethics questions involving Mr.”
Friends of Blackwater v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 391 F. Supp. 2d 115 (D.D.C. 2005). “43 C.F.R. § 2.22 (a)(1). Plaintiff contends that responsive documents “almost certainly” are maintained within the files of the Office of the Secretary because the Secretary “directly oversees” the FWS and is likely to have discussed enforcement with the FWS as part of its…”
Wilderness Soc'y v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 344 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2004). “2d at 7 (quoting 43 C.F.R. § 2.22 (a)(1) (2004)). 19 The court concluded that it would “strain credulity to find that the Secretary’s Office did not know that the Office of the Inspector General and the Solicitor’s Office would likely be repositories of responsive records.”
Arthur West v. Off. Of The Governor, State Of Washington, No. 82057-5 (Wash. Ct. App. Mar. 15, 2021). “2d at 13 ; 43 C.F.R. § 2.22 (a)(1). No such regulation exists here.”
Rocky Mountain Wild, Inc. v. United States Bureau of Land Mgmt., No. 1:17-cv-00636 (D. Colo. Apr. 22, 2020). “2005) (quoting 43 C.F.R. § 2.22 (a)(1)). An agency’s failure to pursue “clear leads” indicating that other individuals or offices should be searched renders a search inadequate.”
Rocky Mountain Wild, Inc. v. United States Forest Serv., No. 1:18-cv-03065, 2021 WL 825985 (D. Colo. Mar. 4, 2021). “2005) (quoting 43 C.F.R. § 2.22 (a)(1)), the agency must forward along the request.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.