43 C.F.R. § 3451.2

Notification of readjusted lease terms

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) If the notification that the lease will be readjusted did not contain the readjusted lease terms, the authorized officer will, within the time specified in the notice that the lease shall be readjusted, notify the lessee by decision of the readjusted lease terms.

(b) The decision transmitting the readjusted lease terms and conditions to the lessee(s) of record shall constitute the final action of the Bureau of Land Management on all the provisions contained in a readjusted lease and will be provided to the lessee(s) of record prior to the anniversary date. The effective date of the readjusted lease shall not be affected by the filing of any appeal of, or a civil suit regarding, any of the readjusted terms and conditions.

(d) The lessee may appeal the decision of the authorized officer in accordance with the procedure set out in 43 CFR part 4; and

(e) Regardless of whether an appeal is filed by the lessee(s), all of the readjusted lease terms and conditions, including, but not limited to, the reporting and payment of rental and royalty, shall be effective on the anniversary date.

[47 FR 33146, July 30, 1982, and 53 FR 37300, Sept. 26, 1988]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1986–1994 · leading case: Coastal States Energy Co. v. Watt, 629 F. Supp. 9 (D. Utah 1986).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Coastal States Energy Co. v. Watt, 629 F. Supp. 9 (D. Utah 1986). · cites it 2× “43 C.F.R. § 3451.2 (1981). If the lessee was not satisfied with the BLM’s resolution of the objections, the lessee could appeal to the IBLA.”

Arch Mineral Corp. v. Lujan, 911 F.2d 408 (10th Cir. 1990). · cites it 2× “In support of its argument that on the respective dates of the IBLA decisions the Secretary had a matured claim against Ark, Ark relies on 43 C.F.R. § 3451.2 (e) (1986), which provides as follows 1 : The readjusted lease terms and conditions shall be effective pending the…”

Valley Camp of Utah, Inc. v. Babbitt, 24 F.3d 1263 (10th Cir. 1994). “”); 43 C.F.R. § 3451.2 (a) (1990) (“the authorized officer .”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.