43 C.F.R. § 4.124

Hearing scheduling

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Hearing location and date. The ALJ, in coordination with the parties and consistent with any applicable statutory requirements, will schedule the hearing and determine the hearing location and dates. In making this determination, the ALJ may consider other relevant factors such as the convenience of the parties and witnesses, the availability of suitable hearing space, and the need for any special accommodations.

(b) Videoconferencing and other technology. In appropriate circumstances as determined by the ALJ, a hearing may be conducted, in whole or in part, using videoconferencing or other suitable technology.

(c) Notice of hearing. In advance of the hearing, a written notice containing the hearing location and hearing dates will be issued to all parties to the proceeding. If a hearing will be conducted, in whole or in part, using videoconferencing or other technology, the hearing notice will contain instructions and guidance for participating in the hearing.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1983–1983 · leading case: Turner v. Watt, 566 F. Supp. 87 (D. Utah 1983).
Turner v. Watt, 566 F. Supp. 87 (D. Utah 1983). · cites it 3× “He based much of his analysis on 43 C.F.R. 4.124 [4.125 in the 1982 edition of CFR], which provides as follows: Decisions of the Board will be made upon the record as described in 4.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.