43 C.F.R. § 4130.3
Terms and conditions
(a) Livestock grazing permits and leases shall contain terms and conditions determined by the authorized officer to be appropriate to achieve management and resource condition objectives for the public lands and other lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management, and to ensure conformance with the provisions of subpart 4180 of this part.
(b) Upon a BLM offer of a permit or lease, the permit or lease terms and conditions may be protested and appealed under part 4 and subpart 4160 of this part.
(c) If any term or condition of a BLM-offered permit or lease is stayed pending appeal, BLM will authorize grazing use as provided in § 4160.4 with respect to the stayed term or condition.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2002–2010 · leading case: Oregon Nat. Desert Ass'n v. Bureau of Land Mgmt., 625 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 2010).
Oregon Nat. Desert Ass'n v. Bureau of Land Mgmt., 625 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 2010). “It could, for example, place limitations on grazing leases on lands with wilderness characteristics “to achieve management and resource condition objectives for the public lands,” 43 C.F.R. § 4130.3 (a), or reduce the “levels of production or use” on such lands through a…”
Oregon Nat. Desert Ass'n v. Bureau of Land Mgmt., 531 F.3d 1114 (9th Cir. 2008). “It could, for example, place limitations on grazing leases on lands with wilderness characteristics “to achieve management and resource condition objectives for the public lands,” 43 C.F.R. § 4130.3 (a), or reduce the “levels of production or use” on such lands through a…”
Idaho Watersheds Proj. v. Hahn, 307 F.3d 815 (9th Cir. 2002). “As a result of these regulatory changes, the BLM found that most ranchers needed new multi-year permits because they either did not hold a permit or because their permit had expired. C. The Sixty-Eight Cattle Grazing Permits Issued In 1997 In 1997, in order to comply with the…”
W. Watersheds Proj. v. Interior Bd. of Land Appeals, 624 F.3d 983 (9th Cir. 2010). “43 C.F.R. § 4130.3 -l(a). Thus, agency action results in either the grant or denial of a permit — or its renewal or non-renewal— which includes consideration of rangeland health and provides opportunity for interested parties to object.”
Oregon Nat. Desert Ass'n v. Bureau of Land Mgmt. (9th Cir. 2008). “It could, for example, place limitations on grazing leases on lands with wilderness characteristics “to achieve management and resource condition objectives for the public lands,” 43 C.F.R. § 4130.3 (a), or reduce the “levels of production or use” on such lands through a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.