C.F.R. » Title 47 » CHAPTER I—FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION › SUBCHAPTER B—COMMON CARRIER SERVICES › PART 61—TARIFFS › Subpart C—General Rules for Nondominant Carriers

47 C.F.R. § 61.26

Tariffing of competitive interstate switched exchange access services

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Definitions. For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:

(1) CLEC shall mean a local exchange carrier that provides some or all of the interstate exchange access services used to send traffic to or from an end user and does not fall within the definition of “incumbent local exchange carrier” in 47 U.S.C. 251(h).

(2) Competing ILEC shall mean the incumbent local exchange carrier, as defined in 47 U.S.C. 251(h), that would provide interstate exchange access services, in whole or in part, to the extent those services were not provided by the CLEC.

(3) Switched exchange access services shall include:

(i) The functional equivalent of the ILEC interstate exchange access services typically associated with the following rate elements: Carrier common line (originating); carrier common line (terminating); local end office switching; interconnection charge; information surcharge; tandem switched transport termination (fixed); tandem switched transport facility (per mile); tandem switching;

(ii) The termination of interexchange telecommunications traffic to any end user, either directly or via contractual or other arrangements with an affiliated or unaffiliated provider of interconnected VoIP service, as defined in 47 U.S.C. 153(25), or a non-interconnected VoIP service, as defined in 47 U.S.C. 153(36), that does not itself seek to collect reciprocal compensation charges prescribed by this subpart for that traffic, regardless of the specific functions provided or facilities used.

(4) Non-rural ILEC shall mean an incumbent local exchange carrier that is not a rural telephone company under 47 U.S.C. 153(44).

(5) The rate for interstate switched exchange access services shall mean the composite, per-minute rate for these services, including all applicable fixed and traffic-sensitive charges.

(6) Rural CLEC shall mean a CLEC that does not serve (i.e., terminate traffic to or originate traffic from) any end users located within either:

(i) Any incorporated place of 50,000 inhabitants or more, based on the most recently available population statistics of the Census Bureau or

(ii) An urbanized area, as defined by the Census Bureau.

(b) Except as provided in paragraphs (c), (e), and (g) of this section, a CLEC shall not file a tariff for its interstate switched exchange access services that prices those services above the higher of:

(1) The rate charged for such services by the competing ILEC or

(2) The lower of:

(i) The benchmark rate described in paragraph (c) of this section or

(ii) In the case of interstate switched exchange access service, the lowest rate that the CLEC has tariffed for its interstate exchange access services, within the six months preceding June 20, 2001.

(c) The benchmark rate for a CLEC's switched exchange access services will be the rate charged for similar services by the competing ILEC. If an ILEC to which a CLEC benchmarks its rates, pursuant to this section, lowers the rate to which a CLEC benchmarks, the CLEC must revise its rates to the lower level within 15 days of the effective date of the lowered ILEC rate.

(d) Except as provided in paragraph (g) of this section, and notwithstanding paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, in the event that, after June 20, 2001, a CLEC begins serving end users in a metropolitan statistical area (MSA) where it has not previously served end users, the CLEC shall not file a tariff for its exchange access services in that MSA that prices those services above the rate charged for such services by the competing ILEC.

(e) Rural exemption. Except as provided in paragraph (g) of this section, and notwithstanding paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section, a rural CLEC competing with a non-rural ILEC shall not file a tariff for its interstate exchange access services that prices those services above the rate prescribed in the NECA access tariff, assuming the highest rate band for local switching. In addition to that NECA rate, the rural CLEC may assess a presubscribed interexchange carrier charge if, and only to the extent that, the competing ILEC assesses this charge. Beginning July 1, 2013, all CLEC reciprocal compensation rates for intrastate switched exchange access services subject to this subpart also shall be no higher than that NECA rate.

(f) If a CLEC provides some portion of the switched exchange access services used to send traffic to or from an end user not served by that CLEC, the rate for the access services provided may not exceed the rate charged by the competing ILEC for the same access services, except if the CLEC is listed in the database of the Number Portability Administration Center as providing the calling party or dialed number, the CLEC may, to the extent permitted by § 51.913(b) of this chapter, assess a rate equal to the rate that would be charged by the competing ILEC for all exchange access services required to deliver interstate traffic to the called number.

(g) Notwithstanding paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section:

(1) A CLEC engaging in access stimulation, as that term is defined in § 61.3(bbb), shall not file a tariff for its interstate exchange access services that prices those services above the rate prescribed in the access tariff of the price cap LEC with the lowest switched access rates in the state.

(2) A CLEC engaging in access stimulation, as that term is defined in § 61.3(bbb), shall file revised interstate switched access tariffs within forty-five (45) days of commencing access stimulation, as that term is defined in § 61.3(bbb), or within forty-five (45) days of [date] if the CLEC on that date is engaged in access stimulation, as that term is defined in § 61.3(bbb).

(3) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, if a CLEC is engaged in Access Stimulation, as defined in § 61.3(bbb), it shall:

(i) Within 45 days of commencing Access Stimulation, or within 45 days of November 27, 2019, whichever is later, file tariff revisions removing from its tariff terminating switched access tandem switching and terminating switched access tandem transport access charges assessable to an Interexchange Carrier for any traffic between the tandem and the local exchange carrier's terminating end office or equivalent; and

(ii) Within 45 days of commencing Access Stimulation, or within 45 days of November 27, 2019, whichever is later, the CLEC shall not file a tariffed rate that is assessable to an Interexchange Carrier for terminating switched access tandem switching or terminating switched access tandem transport access charges for any traffic between the tandem and the local exchange carrier's terminating end office or equivalent.

[76 FR 73881, Nov. 29, 2011, as amended at 77 FR 20553, Apr. 5, 2012; 84 FR 57652, Oct. 28, 2019]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2008–2023 · leading case: Great Lakes Comnet, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 823 F.3d 998 (D.C. Cir. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Great Lakes Comnet, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 823 F.3d 998 (D.C. Cir. 2016). · cites it 7× “47 C.F.R. § 61.26 (b) (“[A] CLEC shall not file a tariff for its interstate switched exchange access services that prices those services above .”
CallerID4u, Inc. v. MCI Commc'ns Servs. Inc., 880 F.3d 1048 (9th Cir. 2018). · cites it 4× “9923, 9934 (2001) (“Access Reform Order”); 47 C.F.R. § 61.26 , But CallerID4u had neither a tar *1052 iff nor a contract in place during a six-month period in which it provided telecommunications services to AT&T and Verizon.”
N. Valley Commc'ns, L.L.C. v. AT & T Corp., 245 F. Supp. 3d 1120 (D.S.D. 2017). · cites it 7× “See 47 C.F.R. § 61.26 . The FCC has the authority to determine the “just and reasonable charge” for a telecommunications service.”
CoreTel Virginia, LLC v. Verizon Virginia, LLC, 752 F.3d 364 (4th Cir. 2014). · cites it 2× “See 47 C.F.R. § 61.26 (a)(3)(ii) (2012). This regulation merely defines the term for the purposes of determining what tariffs will be subject to regulation as switched-access tariffs.”
Peerless Network, Inc. v. MCI Commc'ns Servs., I, 917 F.3d 538 (7th Cir. 2019). “See 47 C.F.R. § 61.26 (g). Even then, Verizon argues, the reduced rates did not comply with FCC rules.”
At&T Corp. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 841 F.3d 1047 (D.C. Cir. 2016). “VoIP” provider, the Transformation Order amended 47 C.F.R. § 61.26 (f) to provide an apparently much laxer standard: If a CLEC provides some portion of the switched exchange access services .”
All Am. Tel. Co. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 867 F.3d 81 (D.C. Cir. 2017). “See 47 C.F.R. § 61.26 (b); Hyperion Telecomms.”
PAETEC Commc'ns, Inc. v. MCI Commc'ns Servs., Inc., 712 F. Supp. 2d 405 (E.D. Pa. 2010). · cites it 3× “PAETEC’s Tariff Is Not Void Ab Initio Verizon contends that PAETEC’s cross-reference to 47 C.F.R. § 61.26 , which its tariff contained until November of 2008, violated 47 C.”
At&t Corp. v. Fcc, 970 F.3d 344 (D.C. Cir. 2020). “911(c), which caps the rates for competitive local exchange carriers at certain rates “charged by the competing incumbent local exchange carrier, in accordance with the same procedures specified in” 47 C.F.R. § 61.26 . Rule 61.26 is limited to “nondominant carriers,” id.”
N. Valley Commc'ns, LLC v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 717 F.3d 1017 (D.C. Cir. 2013). “9108, 9114, ¶ 13 (2004); 47 C.F.R. § 61.26 (a). In the related context of ILECs, an “end user” has been defined by the FCC to mean the recipient of a “telecommunications service.”
Qwest Commc'ns Co. v. Aventure Commc'ns Tech., LLC, 86 F. Supp. 3d 933 (S.D. Iowa 2015). · cites it 2× “at 17994 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 61.26 ; In re: Access Charge Reform, Reform of Access Charges Imposed by Competitive Local Exchange Carriers, Seventh Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Seventh Report and Order), 16 FCC Rcd.”
Aventure Commc'ns Tech., LLC v. Sprint Commc'ns Co., 224 F. Supp. 3d 706 (S.D. Iowa 2015). · cites it 2× “at 17994 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 61.26 ; In re: Access Charge Reform, Reform of Access Charges Imposed by Competitive Local Exchange Carriers, Seventh Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Seventh Report and Order), 16 FCC Rcd.”
Show all 27 citing cases →
— 47 C.F.R. § 61.26(a)(1) — 1 case
Westphalia Tel. Co. v. At&t Corp (Mich. Ct. App. 2016).
— 47 C.F.R. § 61.26(a)(6) — 1 case
Westphalia Tel. Co. v. At&t Corp (Mich. Ct. App. 2016).
— 47 C.F.R. § 61.26(e) — 1 case
Westphalia Tel. Co. v. At&t Corp (Mich. Ct. App. 2016).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.