48 C.F.R. § 31.201
31.201 General.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2025 · leading case: ATK Thiokol, Inc. v. United States, 68 Fed. Cl. 612 (Fed. Cl. 2005).
ATK Thiokol, Inc. v. United States, 68 Fed. Cl. 612 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “” 48 C.F.R. § 31.201 . Fifty-two subsections in the FAR specify the allowability of certain costs.”
Directv Grp., Inc. v. United States, 670 F.3d 1370 (Fed. Cir. 2012). “216-7 (h)(2), and the Credits provision, 48 C.F.R. § 31.201 -5prohibit DIRECTV from satisfying its liability for segment closing adjustments via cost reductions attributable to the pension assets transferred to Raytheon and Boeing as successor contractors.”
Info. Sys. & Networks Corp. v. United States, 48 Fed. Cl. 265 (Fed. Cl. 2000). “48 C.F.R. § 31.201 -l(a) (2000). After performance, a contractor requests reimbursement for indirect costs via an “indirect rate proposal,” which relates back to the *267 agreed-upon rates for allowable costs for that certain type of contract.”
CBS Corp. v. United States, 90 Fed. Cl. 456 (Fed. Cl. 2009). “2[, 48 C.F.R. §§ 31.201 to 31.205].” FAR 31.201-2(a) (which is part of FAR subpart 31.”
Sec'y of Def. v. Pratt & Whitney (Fed. Cir. 2025). “In this respect, the government relies on the FAR’s credits provision, codified at 48 C.F.R. § 31.201 - 5. We are skeptical a reimbursed cost could be properly included in the overhead pool, but we decline to reach this issue.”
Teknowledge Corp. v. United States, 350 F. App'x 452 (Fed. Cir. 2009). “” 48 C.F.R. 31.201 — 1(b). That part of the FAR provides that: A cost is allocable if it is assignable or chargeable to one or more cost objectives on the basis of relative benefits received or other equitable relationship.”
United States v. Reeder (6th Cir. 2008). “6 Each of the subcontracts included: (1) a term requiring that AIMSI acknowledge that it was being reimbursed by the prime contractor with funds advanced from the Department of Energy; (2) a term requiring that interim reimbursement funds be used only for costs that were…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.