C.F.R. » Title 48 » CHAPTER 5—GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION › SUBCHAPTER H—CLAUSES AND FORMS › PART 552—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES › Subpart 552.2—Text of Provisions and Clauses

48 C.F.R. § 552.238-70

552.238-70 Cover Page for Worldwide Federal Supply Schedules.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

As prescribed in 538.273(a)(1), insert the following provision:

Cover Page for Worldwide Federal Supply Schedules (MAY 2019) For All Geographic Areas

Solicitation No. [The contracting officer should insert the solicitation number here]*____*

Federal Supply Schedule Contract for All Geographic Areas [For supplies, the Contracting Officer should complete the information required by paragraph (a) and delete paragraph (b) in its entirety. For services, the Contracting Officer should complete the information required by paragraph (b) and delete (a) in its entirety. For solicitations containing both supplies and services, the Contracting Officer should complete paragraphs (a) and (b).]

(a) Federal Supply Classification (FSC) GROUP *____* PART *____* SECTION *____*

SUPPLY: *____* FSC CLASS(ES)/PRODUCT CODE(S)/NAICS: *____*

(b) STANDARD INDUSTRY GROUP: *____* SERVICE: *____* SERVICE CODE(S)/NAICS: *____*

(End of provision)

Alternate I (MAY 2019): As prescribed at 538.273(a)(1)(i), add the following paragraph (c) to the basic provision.

(c) PERIOD: *____* THROUGH *____*

[84 FR 17041, Apr. 23, 2019]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2010–2010 · leading case: United States Ex Rel. Thomas v. Siemens AG, 708 F. Supp. 2d 505 (E.D. Pa. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States Ex Rel. Thomas v. Siemens AG, 708 F. Supp. 2d 505 (E.D. Pa. 2010). “Second, Thomas maintains that SMS failed to comply with its affirmative obligation under 48 C.F.R. § 552.238-70 to disclose to the government subsequent price reductions it offered to other customers after the government had awarded it contracts and to offer the government a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.