48 C.F.R. § 806.302-5
806.302-5 Authorized or required by statute.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1991–1992 · leading case: Rapides Reg'l Med. Ctr. v. Sec'y, Dep't of Vets.' Affairs, 974 F.2d 565 (5th Cir. 1992).
Rapides Reg'l Med. Ctr. v. Sec'y, Dep't of Vets.' Affairs, 974 F.2d 565 (5th Cir. 1992). “While acknowledging the VA regulation set forth at 48 C.F.R. 806.302-5(b), which exempts the sharing program from CICA, the court noted: 48 C.”
Rapides Reg'l Med. Ctr. v. Sec'y, Dep't Of Vets.' Affairs, 974 F.2d 565 (5th Cir. 1992). “While acknowledging the VA regulation set forth at 48 C.F.R. 806.302-5(b), which exempts the sharing program from CICA, the court noted: 10 48 C.”
Rapides Reg'l Med. Ctr. v. Derwinski, 783 F. Supp. 1006 (W.D. La. 1991). “That regulation, found in 48 C.F.R. 806.302-5, provides in part: Sharing contracts negotiated under 38 U.”
— 48 C.F.R. § 806.302-5(b) — 3 cases
Rapides Reg'l Med. Ctr. v. Sec'y, Dep't of Vets.' Affairs, 974 F.2d 565 (5th Cir. 1992). “While acknowledging the VA regulation set forth at 48 C.F.R. 806.302-5(b), which exempts the sharing program from CICA, the court noted: 48 C.”
Rapides Reg'l Med. Ctr. v. Sec'y, Dep't Of Vets.' Affairs, 974 F.2d 565 (5th Cir. 1992). “While acknowledging the VA regulation set forth at 48 C.F.R. 806.302-5(b), which exempts the sharing program from CICA, the court noted: 10 48 C.”
Rapides Reg'l Med. Ctr. v. Derwinski, 783 F. Supp. 1006 (W.D. La. 1991). “That regulation, found in 48 C.F.R. 806.302-5, provides in part: Sharing contracts negotiated under 38 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.