49 C.F.R. § 390.16
[Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1972–1987 · leading case: Boynton Cab Co. v. Dep't of Indus., Labor & Human Relations, 291 N.W.2d 850 (Wis. 1980).
Boynton Cab Co. v. Dep't of Indus., Labor & Human Relations, 291 N.W.2d 850 (Wis. 1980). “…flight attendant)). [9] "Intracity" is defined as "wholly within a municipality, or the commercial zone thereof." 49 CFR 390.16.”
Siskey v. Gen. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local No. 261, 419 F. Supp. 48 (W.D. Pa. 1976). “49 C.F.R. §§ 390.16 , 390.33. Although plaintiff was qualified for this position despite his blind eye, that “exempted” position was given to Roy Baker, an employee who had more seniority than plaintiff.”
Jack Harvill v. Roadway Express, Inc., 640 F.2d 167 (8th Cir. 1981). “Harvill, however, had never driven placarded loads in excess of the weight limitations fixed by the Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations, 49 C.F.R. § 390.16 , 2 nor driven outside of the commercial zone of the St.”
Colorado Civil Rights Comm'n v. Conagra Flour Milling Co., 736 P.2d 842 (Colo. Ct. App. 1987). “See 49 C.F.R. §§ 390.16 , 391.2(a), 1048.101.”
Smith v. Dep't of Motor Vehs., 163 Cal. App. 3d 321 (Cal. Ct. App. 1984). “( 49 C.F.R. §§ 390.16 , 390.33(a)A3.) *327 We hold that California Administrative Code, section 100.”
Miller v. ICX, 358 F. Supp. 1378 (N.D. Ill. 1972). “49 C.F.R. § 390.16 . On January 5, 1971, defendant disqualified plaintiff as a driver.”
Harvill v. Roadway Express, Inc., 490 F. Supp. 797 (E.D. Mo. 1980). “Plaintiff, prior to January of 1976, had been a city driver for Owens Transfer for a period of eight years, but had never driven placarded loads in excess of the weight limitations as set forth in 49 C.F.R. § 390.16 (1975), nor driven outside of the commercial zone of the St.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.