49 C.F.R. § 392.8

Emergency equipment, inspection and use

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

No commercial motor vehicle shall be driven unless the driver thereof is satisfied that the emergency equipment required by § 393.95 of this subchapter is in place and ready for use; nor shall any driver fail to use or make use of such equipment when and as needed.

[49 FR 38290, Sept. 28, 1984, as amended at 60 FR 38746, July 28, 1995]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1994–2018 · leading case: Poulin v. Greer, 18 F.3d 979 (1st Cir. 1994).
Poulin v. Greer, 18 F.3d 979 (1st Cir. 1994). “Specifically, plaintiffs maintain that the district court should have instructed the jury (1) that Greer could lawfully drive his tractor-trailer only if he was satisfied that he had three emergency reflective triangles with him ready for use, see 49 C.F.R. §§ 392.8 ,…”
Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's & Those Cos. Severally Subscribing to Boeing Policy No. Marcw150053 & Related Policies Governing the Cargo v. S. Pride Trucking, Inc., 301 F. Supp. 3d 949 (D. Neb. 2018). “See filing 190 at 22-44; see also 49 CFR § 392.8 , 49 CFR § 393.95 (f)(2) ; 49 CFR 393.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.