49 C.F.R. § 501.2
General
The responsibilities and authorities delegated to NHTSA and the Administrator are set forth in §§ 1.81, 1.94, and 1.95 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases, 1978–2013 · leading case: Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co., 451 Mass. 623 (Mass. 2008).
Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co., 451 Mass. 623 (Mass. 2008). “(2000), 49 C.F.R. § 501.2 (a)(1) (2006), 8 as well as with Ford’s internal guidelines.”
Patricia M. Wood v. Gen. Motors Corp., 865 F.2d 395 (1st Cir. 1988). “§ 105 , 49 C.F.R. § 501.2 (a) (1987). ."Crashworthiness” encompasses more than protection from the second collision.”
Nancy Gracia v. Volvo Europa Truck, N v. a Foreign Corp., 112 F.3d 291 (7th Cir. 1997). “50 ; see 49 C.F.R. § 501.2 . 3 The safety standard relevant to this appeal is FMVSS 212, which “establishes windshield retention requirements for motor vehicles during crashes.”
Lynda D. Perry v. Mercedes Benz of North Am., Inc. & Abc Ins. Co., 957 F.2d 1257 (5th Cir. 1992). “See 49 C.F.R. § 501.2 . The NHTSA fulfilled its responsibility by promulgating the MVSS published at 49 C.”
Nat'l Truck Equip. Ass'n v. Nat'l High. Traffic Saf. Admin., 711 F.3d 662 (6th Cir. 2013). “§ 30111 (a), a statutory duty the Secretary has delegated to NHTSA since 1980, see 49 C.F.R. § 501.2 (2010). NHTSA’s standards serve as mandatory performance benchmarks for motor vehicles and their constituent parts.”
Ctr. for Auto Saf. v. Nat'l High. Traffic Saf. Admin., 710 F.2d 842 (D.C. Cir. 1983). “49 C.F.R. § 501.2 (f) (1982). . 15 U.S.C.”
Intermodal Tech., Incor v. Mary Peters, 549 F.3d 1029 (6th Cir. 2008). “§ 30111 (a), a duty the Secretary has delegated to NHTSA, see 49 C.F.R. § 501.2 . The Act makes it unlawful to manufacture a motor vehicle for sale that does not meet NHTSA’s safety requirements, 49 U.”
Paccar, Inc. v. Nat'l High. Traffic Saf. Admin., 573 F.2d 632 (9th Cir. 1978). “49 C.F.R. § 501.2 . Each manufacturer 7 of affected vehicles must certify that vehicles produced after the effective date of a standard conform to that standard.”
Perry v. Mercedes Benz of North Am., Inc., 761 F. Supp. 437 (M.D. La. 1991). “49 CFR § 501.2 , which provides: “The Administrator [of the NHTSA] is authorized by the Secretary of Transportation (49 CFR 1.”
Sims v. Florida, Dep't of High. Saf. & Motor Vehs., 832 F.2d 1558 (11th Cir. 1987). “§ 1392(a); see 49 C.F.R. § 501.2 (1986). After consideration of relevant motor vehicle safety data, the NHTSA is authorized to issue safety standards that take into account the reasonableness, practicability, and appropriateness of the standards, and the extent to which the…”
Perry v. Mercedes Benz of North Am., Inc. (5th Cir. 1992). “See 49 C.F.R. § 501.2 . The NHTSA fulfilled its responsibility by promulgating the MVSS published at 49 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.