C.F.R. » Title 5 » CHAPTER I—OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT › SUBCHAPTER B—CIVIL SERVICE REGULATIONS › PART 300—EMPLOYMENT (GENERAL) › Subpart F—Time-In-Grade Restrictions

5 C.F.R. § 300.601

Purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The restrictions in this subpart are intended to prevent excessively rapid promotions in competitive service General Schedule positions and to protect competitive principles. They provide a budgetary control on promotion rates and help assure that appointments are made from appropriate registers. These restrictions are in addition to the eligibility requirements for promotion in part 335 of this chapter.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1983–2016 · leading case: Hauschild v. United States, 53 Fed. Cl. 134 (Fed. Cl. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hauschild v. United States, 53 Fed. Cl. 134 (Fed. Cl. 2002). “1987); see also 5 C.F.R. § 300.601 (time-in-grade restriction implemented to provide budgetary control on promotion rates and assures appropriate appointments).”
James B. Dowd, Jr. v. The United States, 713 F.2d 720 (Fed. Cir. 1983). “5 C.F.R. § 300.601 (b)(1). . Rosano v. Department of the Navy, 699 F.”
Girdis v. Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n, 688 F. Supp. 40 (D. Mass. 1987). “5 C.F.R. § 300.601 (a). 1 The federal time-in-grade restrictions were a bona fide, gender-neutral, acceptable personnel policy.”
Rogers v. Marsh, 573 F. Supp. 635 (E.D. Ark. 1983). · cites it 2× “Rogers was ruled ineligible because of failure to meet “Time in Grade” requirements (5 CFR 300.601, et seq.) because she was a GS-4 and to have been eligible she would have had to have been a GS-5 for at least one year.”
Ibrahim v. United States, 26 Cl. Ct. 359 (Ct. Cl. 1992). “appropriate____” 5 C.F.R. § 300.601 . The court finds that the time-in-grade restrictions are not based on gender, and are permissible exceptions to the Equal Pay Act.”
Lewis v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 750 F.2d 1266 (5th Cir. 1985). “Moreover, the NLRB is constrained in promotions by the provisions of 5 C.F.R. § 300.601 . Pursuant to this provision, a federal employee normally can advance only one grade level each twelve month period.”
Jeffrey S. Sonnega v. Dep't of Just. (MSPB 2016). · cites it 2× “4 See 5 C.F.R. §§ 300.601 , 300.605. Rather, as is evident from the vacancy announcement for the GS-14 School Psychologist position, the specialized experience requirement challenged by the appellant is a qualification standard setting the minimum experience required for…”
Wilson Mathews, III v. Smithsonian Inst. (MSPB 2015). “See 5 C.F.R. §§ 300.601 -.606. However, those restrictions are not required in all circumstances.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.