5 C.F.R. § 330.205
Agency RPL applications
Agencies may develop their own application format which must, at a minimum:
(a) Allow an RPL eligible to register for positions at the same representative rate and work schedule (full-time, part-time, seasonal, or intermittent) as the position from which the RPL eligible was, or will be, separated; and
(b) Allow an RPL eligible to specify the conditions under which he or she will accept a position, including grades or pay levels, appointment type (permanent or time-limited), occupations (e.g., position classification series or career groups), and minimum number of hours of work per week, as applicable.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1991–2006 · leading case: John F. Roberto v. Dep't of the Navy, 440 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 2006).
John F. Roberto v. Dep't of the Navy, 440 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “5 C.F.R. §§ 330.205 (b), (c). Section 330.”
Romeo M. Rasing v. Dep't of the Navy, 444 F.3d 1349 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “In particular, under 5 C.F.R. § 330.205 (e)(2)(i) an agency may fill a specific position with “a current, qualified employee of the agency through [d]etail or position change (promotion, demotion, reassignment)” rather than with a qualified employee from the RPL.”
Jerry C. Sturdy v. Dep't of the Army, 440 F.3d 1328 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “5 C.F.R. §§ 330.205 (b), (c). Section 330.”
Peter R. Kachanis, Jr. v. Dep't of the Treasury, 212 F.3d 1289 (Fed. Cir. 2000). “See 5 C.F.R. § 330.205 (a). Moreover, the Board did not address the Agency’s failure to consider Kachanis for positions beyond his assigned geographical area and grade level.”
Black v. Tomlinson, 425 F. Supp. 2d 101 (D.D.C. 2006). “See 5 C.F.R. § 330.205 (b). Moreover, plaintiff has offered no evidence indicating that the position was ultimately filled by an applicant who required training on the machine.”
Rasing v. Dep't of the Navy (Fed. Cir. 2006). “In particular, under 5 C.F.R. § 330.205 (c)(2)(i) an agency may fill a specific position with “a current, qualified employee of the agency through [d]etail or position change (promotion, demotion, reassignment)” rather than with a qualified employee from the RPL.”
Sturdy v. Dept. Of the Army (Fed. Cir. 2006). “5 C.F.R. §§ 330.205 (b), (c). Section 330.”
Robert W. Curtius v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 951 F.2d 1267 (Fed. Cir. 1991). “Under 5 CFR 330.205(a), the types of employment of others which would violate Mr.”
Roberto v. Dept. Of the Navy (Fed. Cir. 2006). “5 C.F.R. §§ 330.205 (b), (c). Section 330.”
Murphy v. Dep't of Navy, 48 F. App'x 758 (Fed. Cir. 2002). “Pursuant to 5 C.F.R. § 330.205 , an agency may not select an individual not on the reemployment priority list to fill a position when a qualified individual is available on the agency’s rolls.”
— 5 C.F.R. § 330.205(a) — 1 case
Robert W. Curtius v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 951 F.2d 1267 (Fed. Cir. 1991). “Under 5 CFR 330.205(a), the types of employment of others which would violate Mr.”
— 5 C.F.R. § 330.205(b) — 1 case
Robert W. Curtius v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 951 F.2d 1267 (Fed. Cir. 1991). “Under 5 CFR 330.205(a), the types of employment of others which would violate Mr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.