5 C.F.R. § 536.102

Coverage

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Subject to the exclusions in paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section, this part covers any employee who, at the time this part is applied—

(1) Is in a covered pay system; or

(2) Is moving to a position under a covered pay system from a position not under a covered pay system, as long as the individual was an employee as defined in 5 CFR 536.103 while serving in the position in a noncovered pay system.

(b) An agency may not provide grade or pay retention under this part to an employee who—

(1) Is reduced in grade or pay for personal cause or at the employee's request;

(2) Was employed on a temporary or term basis immediately before the action causing the reduction in grade or pay;

(3) Does not satisfactorily complete the probationary period prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 3321(a)(2), and, as a result, is removed from a supervisory or managerial position;

(4) Is entitled to receive a saved rate of basic pay under 5 U.S.C. 3594(c) and 5 CFR 359.705 because of removal from the Senior Executive Service and placement in a civil service position (other than a Senior Executive Service position) under 5 U.S.C. 3594(b)(2);

(5) Moves from an Executive Schedule position paid under 5 U.S.C. chapter 53, subchapter II, or a position whose rate of pay is fixed by law at a rate equal to a rate for the Executive Schedule;

(6) Moves between positions not under a covered pay system or from a position under a covered pay system to a position not under a covered pay system;

(7) Moves to a nonappropriated fund position as described in 5 U.S.C. 2105(c) (except a position occupied by a prevailing rate employee);

(8) Moves from a nonappropriated fund position as described in 5 U.S.C. 2105(c) (except a position occupied by a prevailing rate employee) to a position in a covered pay system, unless covered by § 536.302(a); or

(9) Is reduced in pay upon termination of a critical position pay authority under 5 CFR part 535.

(c) An agency may not provide grade or pay retention under this part based on the grade or rate of basic pay held by the employee during a temporary promotion or temporary reassignment. However, a temporary promotion or temporary reassignment does not affect an employee's preexisting entitlement to grade or pay retention.

(d) An agency may not provide grade retention under subpart B of this part to an employee who moves from a position not under a covered pay system to a position under a covered pay system.

(e) An employee loses eligibility for or entitlement to grade or pay retention under the conditions specified in §§ 536.207, 536.208, and 536.308.

[70 FR 31305, May 31, 2005, as amended at 73 FR 50183, Aug. 26, 2008]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2004–2022 · leading case: Mudge v. United States, 63 Fed. Cl. 363 (Fed. Cl. 2004).
Mudge v. United States, 63 Fed. Cl. 363 (Fed. Cl. 2004). · cites it 2× “5 C.F.R. § 536.102 (1992). That exclusion applies to Mr.”
Adam v. Kempthorne, 292 F. App'x 646 (9th Cir. 2008). “205 (c), defined as “exclusive of additional pay of any kind,” 5 C.F.R. § 536.102 , and that the locality pay increase would thus not have been reduced by 50%.”
Nina Adams v. Dep't of Def. (MSPB 2022). · cites it 4× “” 5 C.F.R. § 536.102 (a)(2). The parties have not addressed whether such regulations applied to the appellant when she moved to the Physical Security Specialist position in the GS pay system.”
Mudge v. United States, 154 F. App'x 916 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “Mudge because, while he was in Alaska and was paid at the higher wage rate, he was on a temporary reassignment, as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 536.102 (1992). Mudge, 63 Fed.”
Mudge v. United States, 154 Fed. Appx. 916 (Fed. Cir. 2005). “Mudge because, while he was in Alaska and was paid at the higher wage rate, he was on a temporary reassignment, as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 536.102 (1992). Mudge, 63 Fed.”
James Nugent v. Dep't of Labor (MSPB 2014). “See 5 C.F.R. § 536.102 (b)(1); see also 5 C.F.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.