C.F.R. » Title 5 » CHAPTER I—OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT › SUBCHAPTER B—CIVIL SERVICE REGULATIONS › PART 551—PAY ADMINISTRATION UNDER THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT › Subpart C—Minimum Wage Provisions

5 C.F.R. § 551.301

Minimum wage

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section and § 551.311, an agency shall pay each of its employees wages at rates not less than the minimum wage specified in section 6(a)(1) of the Act for all hours of work as defined in subpart D of this part.

(2) The minimum wage provisions of the Act do not apply to a criminal investigator receiving availability pay under § 550.181.

(b) An employee has been paid in compliance with the minimum wage provisions of this subpart if the employee's hourly regular rate of pay, as defined in § 551.511(a) of this part, for the workweek is equal to or in excess of the rate specified in section 6(a)(1) of the Act.

[45 FR 85664, Dec. 30, 1980, as amended at 59 FR 66154, Dec. 23, 1994]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2007–2022 · leading case: Martin v. United States, 117 Fed. Cl. 611 (Fed. Cl. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Martin v. United States, 117 Fed. Cl. 611 (Fed. Cl. 2014). · cites it 4× “for the workweek is equal to or in excess of the rate specified-” 5 CFR § 551.301 (a)-(b). If the covered employee works more than forty hours in a workweek, he or she is entitled to pay that is not less than one and one-half the regular pay for the excess hours.”
Martin v. United States, 130 Fed. Cl. 578 (Fed. Cl. 2017). “See also 5 CFR § 551.301 (2016) (minimum wage regulation from the Office of Personnel Management).”
Avalos v. United States, 54 F.4th 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2022). “” 5 CFR § 551.301 (a)(1). The FLSA provides that employers who violate these provisions “shall be liable to the em- ployee .”
Christofferson v. United States, 77 Fed. Cl. 361 (Fed. Cl. 2007). “Plaintiffs failed to supply a specific statutory provision which would grant the court jurisdiction over their new claims, although they did cite 5 C.F.R. § 551.301 (a), the implementing regulation of FLSA’s minimum wage requirement, 29 U.”
Martin v. United States, 54 F.4th 1325 (Fed. Cir. 2022). “” 5 CFR § 551.301 (a)(1). The FLSA provides that employers who violate these provisions “shall be liable to the em- ployee .”
Martin v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2017). “See also 5 CFR § 551.301 (2016) (minimum wage regulation from the Office of Personnel Management).”
Martin v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2017). “See also 5 CFR § 551.301 (2016) (minimum wage regulation from the Office of Personnel Management).”
Abrantes v. United States, 54 F.4th 1332 (Fed. Cir. 2022). “” 5 CFR § 551.301 (a)(1). The FLSA provides that employers who violate these provisions “shall be liable to the em- ployee .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.