5 C.F.R. § 630.202
Full biweekly pay period; leave earnings
(a) Full-time employees. A full-time employee earns leave during each full biweekly pay period while in a pay status or in a combination of a pay status and a nonpay status.
(b) Part-time employees. Hours in a pay status in excess of an agency's basic working hours in a pay period are disregarded in computing the leave earnings of a part-time employee.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2026 · leading case: Jones v. Castro, 168 F. Supp. 3d 169 (D.D.C. 2016).
Jones v. Castro, 168 F. Supp. 3d 169 (D.D.C. 2016). “6; see also 5 C.F.R. § 630.202 (a) (“A full-time employee earns leave during each full biweekly pay period while in a pay status or in a combination of a pay status and a nonpay status.”
Agee v. United States, 77 Fed. Cl. 84 (Fed. Cl. 2007). “See 5 C.F.R. § 630.202 (a) (“A full-time employee earns leave during each full biweekly pay period while in a pay status or in a combination of a pay status and nonpay status.”
Carman v. United States, 221 Ct. Cl. 165 (Ct. Cl. 1979). “[ 5 C.F.R. § 630.202 (a) (1978).] Of course, an employee, while on military duty or on a leave of absence, is in a nonpay status for each full biweekly pay period he is absent.”
John Bushkell v. Dep't of Just., 2026 MSPB 2 (MSPB 2026). “91 , ¶¶ 5, 7 (2015); 5 C.F.R. § 630.202 (a). We need not resolve precisely the length of the appellant’s absence that would have been covered by his accrued sick leave.”
Johnny L. Ringo v. Dep't of Def., 2015 MSPB 4 (MSPB 2015). “OPM further asserted that its regulation at 5 C.F.R. § 630.202 supports such a reading, requiring an employee to be in pay status or a combination of pay and nonpay status for an entire pay period in order to earn annual or sick leave.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.