C.F.R. » Title 5 » CHAPTER I—OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT › SUBCHAPTER B—CIVIL SERVICE REGULATIONS › PART 838—COURT ORDERS AFFECTING RETIREMENT BENEFITS › Subpart H—Requirements for Court Orders Awarding Former Spouse Survivor Annuities

5 C.F.R. § 838.802

CSRS limitations

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A court order awarding a former spouse survivor annuity under CSRS is not a court order acceptable for processing unless the marriage terminated on or after May 7, 1985.

(b) In the case of a retiree who retired under CSRS before May 7, 1985, a court order awarding a former spouse survivor annuity under CSRS is not a court order acceptable for processing unless the retiree was receiving a reduced annuity to provide a survivor annuity to benefit that spouse on May 7, 1985.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2006–2014 · leading case: Janusz v. Gilliam, 947 A.2d 560 (Md. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Janusz v. Gilliam, 947 A.2d 560 (Md. 2008). · cites it 2× “Janusz became ineligible, pursuant to federal law, 5 C.F.R. § 838.802 (b) (2008), to receive the benefits of the survivor’s annuity.”
Fischbach v. Fischbach, 975 A.2d 333 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2009). “2d 560 (citing 5 C.F.R. § 838.802 (b) (2008)). She was *96 informed of this fact by the Office of Personnel Management several years after the divorce became final.”
Aldrich v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 166 F. App'x 481 (Fed. Cir. 2006). · cites it 5× “5 C.F.R. § 838.802 (a) implements the effective date of the Spouse Equity Act where benefits are sought based on court order in connection with a divorce, i.”
Mark E. Cahill v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt. (MSPB 2014). “IAF, Tab 11 at 5; see 5 C.F.R. §§ 838.802 , 838.1004. The administrative judge dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, finding that the OPM decision under appeal is whether the estate of the appellant’s deceased mother is entitled to survivor annuity benefits, and the…”
Johnson v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 205 F. App'x 835 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “” 5 C.F.R. § 838.802 (a) (2005). In this case, the administrative judge held that not only was Ms.”
— 5 C.F.R. § 838.802(a) — 1 case
Aldrich v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 166 F. App'x 481 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “5 C.F.R. § 838.802 (a) implements the effective date of the Spouse Equity Act where benefits are sought based on court order in connection with a divorce, i.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.