C.F.R. » Title 50 » CHAPTER I—UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR › SUBCHAPTER B—TAKING, POSSESSION, TRANSPORTATION, SALE, PURCHASE, BARTER, EXPORTATION, AND IMPORTATION OF WILDLIFE AND PLANTS › PART 20—MIGRATORY BIRD HUNTING › Subpart D—Possession

50 C.F.R. § 20.36

Tagging requirement

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

No person shall put or leave any migratory game birds at any place (other than at his personal abode), or in the custody of another person for picking, cleaning, processing, shipping, transportation, or storage (including temporary storage), or for the purpose of having taxidermy services performed, unless such birds have a tag attached, signed by the hunter, stating his address, the total number and species of birds, and the date such birds were killed. Migratory game birds being transported in any vehicle as the personal baggage of the possessor shall not be considered as being in storage or temporary storage.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1989–2009 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Neitzel, 678 A.2d 369 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Commonwealth v. Neitzel, 678 A.2d 369 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1996). · cites it 8× “ry game birds at any place (other than at his personal abode), or in the custody of another person for picking, cleaning, processing, shipping, transportation, or storage (including temporary storage), or for the purpose of having taxidermy services performed, unless such birds…”
Moresi v. State, Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries, 567 So. 2d 1081 (La. 1990). · cites it 2× “The tagging regulation, 50 C.F.R. § 20.36 , specifically requires a hunter to tag his kill in four situations: when he leaves it (1) at any place other than his home; (2) in the custody of another for picking, cleaning, etc.”
Moresi v. State, Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries, 552 So. 2d 1259 (La. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 3× “36, which provides that: "No person shall put or leave any migratory game birds at any place (other than at his personal abode), or in the custody of another person for picking, cleaning, processing, shipping, transportation or storage (including temporary storage), or for the…”
State v. McHugh, 630 So. 2d 1259 (La. 1994). “1(B)(8)); 50 C.F.R. § 20.36 , the outlaw arranges to have each limit ferried separately to the landing in several trips by another hunter.”
United States v. Gilkerson, 556 F.3d 854 (8th Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “50 C.F.R. § 20.36 . Receiving or possessing a migratory game bird without the required tag is a misdemeanor.”
United States v. Bookout, 788 F. Supp. 933 (S.D. Tex. 1992). · cites it 4× “A hunter is, in certain situations, required to “tag” his birds by 50 C.F.R. § 20.36 . 2 Neither the parties nor the Court has been able to find any Fifth Circuit authority interpreting this regulation.”
United States v. Gilkerson, 527 F. Supp. 2d 932 (D.S.D. 2007). · cites it 3× “1) charged defendant with having had 60 geese that were not tagged as required by 50 CFR 20.36. The government discovered it was in error and the Amended Information (Doc.”
United States v. Caleb Gilkerson (8th Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “50 C.F.R. § 20.36 . Receiving or possessing a migratory game bird without the required tag is a misdemeanor.”
United States v. Edwards, 976 F. Supp. 810 (E.D. Ark. 1997). · cites it 3× “25 ), and third, failing to tag said birds when leaving them as required by 50 C.F.R. § 20.36 . Both men are also charged as aiding and abetting others in the aforesaid acts, in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Edwards, 976 F. Supp. 807 (E.D. Ark. 1997). “On May 12, 1997, an information was filed by the United States Attorney charging all five hunters with taking in excess of the daily bag limit of ducks ( 50 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.