C.F.R. » Title 7 » CHAPTER X—AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE (MARKETING AGREEMENTS AND ORDERS; MILK), DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE › PART 1001—MILK IN THE NORTHEAST MARKETING AREA › subpart ECFRf377b1296c74a53 — Subpart—Order Regulating Handling

7 C.F.R. § 1001.74

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1986–1987 · leading case: United States v. Daylight Dairy Prods., Inc., 822 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Daylight Dairy Prods., Inc., 822 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1987). “1, requires appellant to make certain “payments[s]” to two producers’ cooperatives, 7 C.F.R. § 1001.74 (d)(2), (3), payments that appellant said it had already made in the form of secured promissory notes that the cooperatives accepted as payment.”
United States v. Daylight Dairy Prods., Inc., 646 F. Supp. 566 (D. Mass. 1986). · cites it 3× “1, 7 C.F.R. § 1001.74 (d). Daylight Dairy argues, as it argued unsuccessfully in the proceedings below, that it satisfied its outstanding payment obligations to Agri-Mark by means of a secured, ten-year note it gave to Agri-Mark in February 1983.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.