7 C.F.R. § 7.20
Prohibition on dual office
(a) A member of the county committee cannot, during the time they are a committee member, also serve as:
(1) The secretary to the county committee;
(2) A member of the State committee; or
(3) A county executive director or any other county office employee.
(b) [Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases, 1962–1998 · leading case: John C. Gross v. United States, 676 F.2d 295 (8th Cir. 1982).
John C. Gross v. United States, 676 F.2d 295 (8th Cir. 1982). “7 C.F.R. § 7.20 . The type of investigation undertaken in this case was essential to implementation of the Feed Grain Program.”
Miller v. U.S. Dep't of Agric. Farm Servs. Agency, 143 F.3d 1413 (11th Cir. 1998). “" 7 C.F.R. § 7.20 . Under these state committees, elected county committees actually implement the ASCS's programs.”
Hedman v. United States, 15 Cl. Ct. 304 (Ct. Cl. 1988). “This authority to appoint employees of the ASCS county offices has been delegated from the Secretary to the State Committee, an “authorized appoint *314 ing authority” for purposes of § 2105, as established, m/m.”
John Gross v. Waldo Sederstrom, Ardell Hanneman & Charles Myers, 429 F.2d 96 (8th Cir. 1970). “The appellant’s contention that the appellees were acting in a ministerial capacity rather than a judicial or discretionary capacity clearly lacks substance. The regulations outlining the duties of the County A.”
Fred Chandler, Sr. v. W. Lewis David, 350 F.2d 669 (5th Cir. 1965). “7 C.F.R. § 7.20 . Amendment 11 provides that “the action of the county committee * * * in reducing the allotment for misrepresentation shall *677 be effective only upon approval of the State committee or its representative.”
Morrow v. Clayton, 326 F.2d 36 (10th Cir. 1963). “* * * ” The duties of the county committee are set out in *42 7 C.F.R. § 7.20 (March 23, 1961), in part: “The county committee, subject to the general direction and supervision of the State committee, and acting through community committeemen and other personnel, shall be…”
United States v. Rasmussen, 222 F. Supp. 430 (D. Mont. 1963). “20 of the Regulations, 7 C.F.R. § 7.20 , specifically provides that the County Committee, ‘subject to the general direction and supervision of the State committee, * * * shall be generally responsible for carrying out in the county the agricultural conservation program * * * ’…”
Miller v. U.S. Dep't of Agric. Farm Servs. Agency, 966 F. Supp. 1087 (N.D. Ala. 1997). “” 7 C.F.R. § 7.20 . Under the supervision of the state committee would be county committees that would serve to implement these programs at the county level.”
Duba v. Schuetzle, 303 F.2d 570 (8th Cir. 1962). “20 of the Regulations, 7 C.F.R. § 7.20 , specifically provides that the County Committee, “subject to the general direction and supervision of the State committee, * * * shall be generally responsible for carrying out in the county the agricultural conservation program * * * ”…”
Morrow v. Clayton, 326 F.2d 36 (10th Cir. 1964). “* * *' The duties of the county committee are set out in 7 C.F.R. 7.20 (March 23, 1961), in part: 'The county committee, subject to the general direction and supervision of the State committee, and acting through community committeemen and other personnel, shall be generally…”
Miller v. USDA Farm Servs. Agency, 143 F.3d 1413 (11th Cir. 1998). “Finally, below these county committees are elected local committees that serve as liaisons between farmers and the state and county committees.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.