8 C.F.R. § 299.1

Prescribed forms

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

A listing of USCIS, ICE, and CBP approved forms referenced in chapter I can be viewed on the Office of Management and Budget Web site at http://www.reginfo.gov. A listing of approved USCIS forms can also be viewed on its Internet Web site.

[76 FR 53797, Aug. 29, 2011]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1962–2023 · leading case: Shweta Kohli v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney Gen., 473 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2007).
Shweta Kohli v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney Gen., 473 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2007). · cites it 2× “Kohli asserts that 8 C.F.R. § 299.1 directs that the NTA must use Form 1-862, and that the form “requires the signature and title of the issuing immigration officer.”
United States v. Pablo Fernandez-Antonia, AKA \Pablo Fernandez\"", 278 F.3d 150 (2d Cir. 2002). “See 8 C.F.R. § 299.1 . 3 . Notably, the amended provisions of 8 U.”
United States v. Sylvia Anita Ryan-Webster, 353 F.3d 353 (4th Cir. 2003). “6 See 8 C.F.R. § 299.1 . A Visa Petition constitutes a request to the INS that the alien named in the Labor Certification be classified as eligible to apply for designation within a specified visa preference employment category.”
Drax v. Reno, 338 F.3d 98 (2d Cir. 2003). “§ 1255 (a); 8 C.F.R. § 299.1 . An alien who, like Drax (the then-unmarried son of a United States citizen), seeks to obtain an immigrant visa on the basis of a familial relationship must cause the relevant family member to file an I-130 visa petition, or “Petition for Alien…”
Pablo Maldonado-Perez v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 865 F.2d 328 (D.C. Cir. 1989). “See 8 C.F.R. § 299.1 (1987) (G-28 (10-25-79) — Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Representative).”
Vera v. Attorney Gen. of the United States, 672 F.3d 187 (3rd Cir. 2012). “” 8 C.F.R. § 299.1 (2000). We do not find the variation in forms to be of great concern as the significant question remains the same: whether at the time of her entry *192 into the United States Vera executed a waiver of her right to contest her removal.”
Pedrozo v. Clinton, 610 F. Supp. 2d 730 (S.D. Tex. 2009). “8 C.F.R. § 299.1 (2008) (prescribed forms); see also 8 C.”
Offiiong v. Holder, 864 F. Supp. 2d 611 (S.D. Tex. 2012). “may be adjusted by the Attorney General, 6 in his discretion and under such regulations as he may prescribe, to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence if (1) the alien makes an application for such adjustment, (2) the alien is eligible to receive an immigrant…”
Saf. Nat'l Cas. Corp. v. United States Dep't of Homeland Sec., 711 F. Supp. 2d 697 (S.D. Tex. 2008). “2(a); 8 C.F.R. § 299.1 ; see also I-352, General Terms and Conditions (“Federal law shall apply to the interpretation of the contract, and its terms shall be strictly construed.”
Jose De Bilbao-Bastida v. Immigtation & Naturalization Serv., 409 F.2d 820 (9th Cir. 1969). “§ 1103 and 8 C.F.R. § 299.1 ) Printed on the back of this card was the following statement: “This card will be honored in lieu of a visa and passport on condition that the rightful holder is returning to the United States after a temporary absence of not more than one year and…”
Linea Area Nacional De Chile S.A. v. Sale, 865 F. Supp. 971 (E.D.N.Y 1994). “See 8 C.F.R. § 299.1 (1994). 2 . Section 212.”
Kohli v. Gonzales (9th Cir. 2007). · cites it 2× “Kohli asserts that 8 C.F.R. § 299.1 directs that the NTA must use Form I-862, and that the form “requires the signature and title of the issuing immigration officer.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.