Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 1
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 1-10-106 (2026)

Summary of election results - statewide elections - early voting

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) (a) Within sixty days after a statewide election, the designated election official shall prepare and make available to the public a statement of the total number of votes cast in the election for each candidate and for and against each ballot issue and ballot question on the ballot certified by the designated election official pursuant to section 1-5-203. (b) and (c) Repealed.

(2) The designated election official may charge a fee for a copy of the statement prepared pursuant to this section in an amount not to exceed the actual cost of making the copy.

(3) The designated election official shall retain all materials used to compile the statement required by this section for a period of at least twenty-five months.

Source: L. 2005: Entire section added, p. 1422, § 50, effective June 6; entire section added, p. 1457, § 50, effective June 6. L. 2006: (1)(c) amended, p. 2035, § 22, effective June 6. L. 2007: (1)(c) amended, p. 1796, § 62, effective June 1. L. 2013: (1)(b) and (1)(c) repealed, (HB 13-1303), ch. 185, p. 752, § 138, effective May 10.

Cross references: In 2013, subsections (1)(b) and (1)(c) were repealed by the "Voter Access and Modernized Elections Act". For the short title and the legislative declaration, see sections 1 and 2 of chapter 185, Session Laws of Colorado 2013.

PART 2

SURVEY OF RETURNS - NONPARTISAN ELECTIONS

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1994–1994 · leading case: Matter of Proposed Initiative, 875 P.2d 861 (Colo. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Matter of Proposed Initiative, 875 P.2d 861 (Colo. 1994). “§ 1-10-106(3)(b), IB C.R.S. (1993 Supp.).”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 1-10-106(3)(b): 1 case
Matter of Proposed Initiative, 875 P.2d 861 (Colo. 1994). “§ 1-10-106(3)(b), IB C.R.S. (1993 Supp.).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.