Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 10-13-111 (2026)

Annual certification - revocation

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Each attorney by or through whom are issued any policies of or contracts for indemnity of the character referred to in this title shall procure from the commissioner annually a certificate of authority stating that all the requirements of this title have been complied with, and, upon such compliance and the payment of the fees and taxes required by this title, the commissioner shall issue such certificate of authority. The commissioner may revoke or suspend any certificate of authority issued in case of breach of any of the conditions imposed by this title after reasonable notice has been given said attorney in writing so that he may appear and show cause why such action should not be taken. Pending such investigation, no information shall be published, but, in case of revocation or suspension of a certificate of authority, notice of the same shall be published by the commissioner in the Denver daily newspapers. Any final action of the commissioner pursuant to this section shall be subject to judicial review by the court of appeals pursuant to section 24-4- 106 (11), C.R.S.

Source: L. 13: p. 373, § 81. C.L. § 2554. CSA: C. 87, § 98. CRS 53: § 72-4-11. C.R.S. 1963: § 72-4-11. L. 92: Entire section amended, p. 1574, § 100, effective May 20.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1984–1984 · leading case: Alias Smith & Jones, Inc. v. Barnes, 695 P.2d 302 (Colo. Ct. App. 1984).
Alias Smith & Jones, Inc. v. Barnes, 695 P.2d 302 (Colo. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 7× “, instead of revoking and suspending the company as authorized by § 10-13-111, C.R.S. Plaintiffs’ sole contention on appeal is that the commissioner of insurance has no discretion under § 10-13-106(1) to issue a new annual certificate of authority to an interin-surance exchange…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.