Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 13
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-27-106 (2026)

Form of unsworn declaration

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

An unsworn declaration under this article 27 must be in substantially the following form:

I declare under penalty of perjury under the law of Colorado that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on the ________ day of ________, ________, (date) (month) (year)

at ___________________________ __________________ (city or other location, and state or country)

____________________________ (printed name)

____________________________ (signature) Source: L. 2018: Entire article added with relocations, (SB 18-032), ch. 8, p. 155, § 9, effective October 1.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 12-55-306 as it existed prior to 2018.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2024–2026 · leading case: People v. Ramcharan, 2024 COA 110 (Colo. Ct. App. 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Ramcharan, 2024 COA 110 (Colo. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 5× “) An unsworn declaration that complies with section 13-27-106, C.R.S. 2024, can be used in place of an affidavit.”
3939 Williams v. Weaver (Colo. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 13× “First, it refused to consider Weaver’s unsworn exhibits because they weren’t sworn affidavits and they didn’t comply with section 13-27-106, C.R.S. 2025. Then, having set aside the exhibits, the trial court concluded that 3939 Williams had proved its claim for breach of contract.”
Martinez v. Martinez (Colo. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 5× “8 Section 13-27-106, C.R.S. 2025, of the Uniform Unsworn Declarations Act provides that an unsworn declaration must, to qualify as a sworn declaration, be in substantially the form shown in that section.”
US Elec. v. QED (Colo. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “§ 13-27-102(7); § 13-27-106, C.R.S. 2025. ¶ 16 In contract law, a party anticipatorily repudiates a contract by manifesting a definite and unequivocal intent “that it will not perform as required by the contract.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.