(Repealed)
Source: L. 71: R&RE, p. 465, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 40-8-604. L. 77: (1) amended, p. 968,
§ 49, effective July 1; IP(1) and (1)(c) amended and (1)(d) added, p. 991, § 1, effective July 1. L.
84: Entire section repealed, p. 503, § 7, effective July 1.
Cross references: For present provision on intimidating a witness or victim, see §§ 18-8-
704 and 18-8-705.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
6
cases, 1977–2004 · leading case:
People v. Cunefare, 102 P.3d 302 (Colo. 2004).
People v. Cunefare, 102 P.3d 302 (Colo. 2004).
· cites it 8× “The defendant was convicted of intimidating a witness under section 18-8-604, 8B C.R.S. (1973) (1978 Repl.”
People v. Stage, 575 P.2d 423 (Colo. 1978).
· cites it 3× “1 Section 18-8-604, C.R.S. 1973. 2 Section 18-7-206, C.”
People v. Proctor, 570 P.2d 540 (Colo. 1977).
· cites it 3× “The jury found the defendant guilty of violating subsection (a) of section 18-8-604, C.R.S. 1973: “Intimidating a witness.”
Honey v. People, 713 P.2d 1300 (Colo. 1986).
“(1973), and one count- of intimidating a witness, § 18-8-604(1), 8 C.R.S. (1973). Immediately before trial the prosecution reduced the second-degree as *1302 sault count to third-degree assault.”
People v. Gonzales, 602 P.2d 6 (Colo. Ct. App. 1978).
· cites it 4× “VIDAL’S APPEAL Vidal contends that the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion for a separate trial on the ground that evidence pertaining to the May 28 assault by Gonzales was inadmissible against him. In the alternative, Vidal contends that even if that evidence were…”
People v. Hower, 626 P.2d 734 (Colo. Ct. App. 1981).
· cites it 2× “His analysis is that, although the evidence shows that he may have intimidated a witness contrary to § 18-8-604, C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Repl. Vol. 8), it does not show that he unlawfully tampered with a witness.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-8-604(1) — 1 case
Honey v. People, 713 P.2d 1300 (Colo. 1986).
“(1973), and one count- of intimidating a witness, § 18-8-604(1), 8 C.R.S. (1973). Immediately before trial the prosecution reduced the second-degree as *1302 sault count to third-degree assault.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.