Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-1-102 (2026)

Legislative declaration

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) The general assembly declares that the purposes of this title are: (a) To secure for each child subject to these provisions such care and guidance, preferably in his own home, as will best serve his welfare and the interests of society; (b) To preserve and strengthen family ties whenever possible, including improvement of home environment; (c) To remove a child from the custody of his parents only when his welfare and safety or the protection of the public would otherwise be endangered and, in either instance, for the courts to proceed with all possible speed to a legal determination that will serve the best interests of the child; and (d) To secure for any child removed from the custody of his parents the necessary care, guidance, and discipline to assist him in becoming a responsible and productive member of society. (1.5) (a) The general assembly declares that it is in the best interests of the child who has been removed from his own home to have the following guarantees: (I) To be placed in a secure and stable environment; (II) To not be indiscriminately moved from foster home to foster home; and (III) To have assurance of long-term permanency planning. (b) (Deleted by amendment, L. 92, p. 220, § 1, effective July 1, 1992.) (1.6) The general assembly recognizes the numerous studies establishing that children undergo a critical bonding and attachment process prior to the time they reach six years of age. Such studies further disclose that a child who has not bonded with a primary adult during this critical stage will suffer significant emotional damage which frequently leads to chronic psychological problems and antisocial behavior when the child reaches adolescence and adulthood. Accordingly, the general assembly finds and declares that it is appropriate to provide for an expedited placement procedure to ensure that children under the age of six years who have been removed from their homes are placed in permanent homes as expeditiously as possible. (1.7) The general assembly further declares that it is the intent of the general assembly to have the media and the courts refrain from causing undue hardship, discomfort, and distress to any juvenile victims of sexual assault, child abuse, incest, or any offenses listed in wrongs to children pursuant to part 4 of article 6 of title 18, C.R.S., by not disseminating or publishing the names of such victims. (1.9) The federal "Family First Prevention Services Act" was enacted on February 9, 2018. In order to comply with the provisions of the federal "Family First Prevention Services Act", the general assembly finds that it is necessary to update current statutes to enable Colorado to provide enhanced support to children, juveniles, or youth, and their families in order to prevent foster care placements. The state department of human services shall implement the updated provisions in this title 19 utilizing prevention services and qualified residential treatment programs when the federal government approves Colorado's five-year Title IV-E prevention plan, and subject to available general fund appropriations or federal funding. (2) To carry out these purposes, the provisions of this title shall be liberally construed to serve the welfare of children and the best interests of society.

Source: L. 87: Entire title R&RE, p. 695, § 1, effective October 1. L. 88: (1.5) added, p. 755, § 1, effective May 31. L. 90: (1.7) added, p. 1007, § 1, effective July 1. L. 92: (1.5) amended, p. 220, § 1, effective July 1. L. 94: (1.6) added, p. 2051, § 1, effective July 1. L. 2019: (1.9) added, (HB 19-1308), ch. 256, p. 2458, § 2, effective August 2. L. 2020: (1.9) amended, (SB 20-162), ch. 221, p. 1087, § 1, effective July 2; (1.9) amended, (HB 20-1402), ch. 216, p. 1047, § 32, effective June 30.

Editor's note: (1) This section was contained in a title that was repealed and reenacted in 1987. This section, as it existed in 1987, is the same as 19-1-102 as said section existed in 1986, the year prior to the repeal and reenactment of this title. (2) Amendments to subsection (1.9) by SB 20-162 and HB 20-1402 were harmonized. Cross references: For the "Family First Prevention Services Act", see Pub.L. 115-123.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 352 cases (160 in the last 5 years), 1975–2026 · leading case: People in Interest of SB, 742 P.2d 935 (Colo. Ct. App. 1987).
People in Interest of SB, 742 P.2d 935 (Colo. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 14× “See § 19-1-102, C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8B); § 14-13-102, C.”
K.D. v. People, 139 P.3d 695 (Colo. 2006). · cites it 4× “§ 19-1-102(1.6), C.R.S. (2005) (emphasis added).”
People in Interest of L.M, 2018 CO 34 (Colo. 2018). · cites it 4× “” § 19-1-102(1), C.R.S. (2017). The Code thus “strives to preserve the family while simultaneously ensuring the child’s best interest and welfare.”
Peo in the Interest of NGG, 2020 COA 6 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 3× “When determining custody or allocating parental responsibilities, the court must consider the legislative purposes of the Children’s Code under section 19-1-102, C.R.S. 2019. People in Interest of C.”
R.Mcg. v. J.W., 615 P.2d 666 (Colo. 1980). · cites it 12× “[T]he unquestioned right of the State to further these desirable ends by legislation is not in itself sufficient to justify the gender-based distinction .”
in Interest of C.W.B., Jr, 2018 CO 8 (Colo. 2018). · cites it 8× “¶36 Additionally, we need not confer standing to foster parents here to assert the rights of the child due to some existing barrier or difficulty in asserting the child’s rights.”
A.S. v. People, 312 P.3d 168 (Colo. 2013). · cites it 4× “(2013)); see also § 19-1-102(1)(a), C.R.S. (2018). The juvenile justice system aims to provide guidance, rehabilitation, and restoration for the juvenile and to protect society, rather than focusing principally on eriminal conduct and assigning criminal responsibility, guilt,…”
A.M. v. A.C., 296 P.3d 1026 (Colo. 2013). · cites it 3× “See § 19-1-102, C.R.S. (2012); L.G., 890 P.2d at 654 .”
People ex rel. C.M., 116 P.3d 1278 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 6× “Relying on §§ 19-1-102, 19-1-104, 19-1-115, and 19-3-508, C.”
People ex rel. C.L.S., 313 P.3d 662 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 3× “" § 19-1-102(2), C.R.S. 2011; People in Interest of SX.”
A.L.L. v. People, 226 P.3d 1054 (Colo. 2010). · cites it 6× “See § 19-1-102(1)(b) (directing the preservation of family ties wherever possible); People ex rel.”
in Interest of S.K, 2019 COA 36 (Colo. Ct. App. 2019). “§§ 19-1-102(1.6), 19-1-123, 19-3-703, C.R.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-1-102(1) — 34 cases
People in Interest of L.M, 2018 CO 34 (Colo. 2018). “” § 19-1-102(1), C.R.S. (2017). The Code thus “strives to preserve the family while simultaneously ensuring the child’s best interest and welfare.”
K.D. v. People, 139 P.3d 695 (Colo. 2006). “§ 19-1-102(1.6), C.R.S. (2005) (emphasis added).”
People in Interest of SB, 742 P.2d 935 (Colo. Ct. App. 1987). “See § 19-1-102, C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8B); § 14-13-102, C.”
People in Interest of BJD, 626 P.2d 727 (Colo. Ct. App. 1981).
People in Interest of MC, 774 P.2d 857 (Colo. 1989).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-1-102(1)(a) — 24 cases
Peo in the Interest of NGG, 2020 COA 6 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020). “When determining custody or allocating parental responsibilities, the court must consider the legislative purposes of the Children’s Code under section 19-1-102, C.R.S. 2019. People in Interest of C.”
A.S. v. People, 312 P.3d 168 (Colo. 2013). “(2013)); see also § 19-1-102(1)(a), C.R.S. (2018). The juvenile justice system aims to provide guidance, rehabilitation, and restoration for the juvenile and to protect society, rather than focusing principally on eriminal conduct and assigning criminal responsibility, guilt,…”
People ex rel. N.G., 303 P.3d 1207 (Colo. Ct. App. 2012).
AC, IV v. People, 16 P.3d 240 (Colo. 2001).
People in Interest of CB, 585 P.2d 281 (Colo. 1978).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-1-102(1)(b) — 22 cases
People ex rel. J.G.C., 318 P.3d 576 (Colo. Ct. App. 2013).
People ex rel. C.Z., 360 P.3d 228 (Colo. Ct. App. 2015).
in Interest of A.A, 2020 COA 154 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020).
A.L.L. v. People, 226 P.3d 1054 (Colo. 2010). “See § 19-1-102(1)(b) (directing the preservation of family ties wherever possible); People ex rel.”
People ex rel. M.D., 338 P.3d 1120 (Colo. Ct. App. 2014).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-1-102(1)(c) — 41 cases
A.L.L. v. People, 226 P.3d 1054 (Colo. 2010). “See § 19-1-102(1)(b) (directing the preservation of family ties wherever possible); People ex rel.”
People ex rel. L.B., 254 P.3d 1203 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011).
People ex rel. N.D.V., 224 P.3d 410 (Colo. Ct. App. 2009).
People in Interest of MC, 774 P.2d 857 (Colo. 1989).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-1-102(1)(d) — 3 cases
People ex rel. A.C., 304 P.3d 589 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011).
in the Interest of L.R.B, 2019 COA 85 (Colo. Ct. App. 2019).
People v. Dist. Court for 17th Jud. Dist., 731 P.2d 652 (Colo. 1987).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-1-102(2) — 38 cases
People in Interest of SB, 742 P.2d 935 (Colo. Ct. App. 1987). “See § 19-1-102, C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8B); § 14-13-102, C.”
People ex rel. C.L.S., 313 P.3d 662 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011). “" § 19-1-102(2), C.R.S. 2011; People in Interest of SX.”
A.S. v. People, 312 P.3d 168 (Colo. 2013). “(2013)); see also § 19-1-102(1)(a), C.R.S. (2018). The juvenile justice system aims to provide guidance, rehabilitation, and restoration for the juvenile and to protect society, rather than focusing principally on eriminal conduct and assigning criminal responsibility, guilt,…”
In Re the Adoption of T.K.J., 931 P.2d 488 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996).
People ex rel. S.X.M., 271 P.3d 1124 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-1-102(20)(d) — 1 case
People in Interest of EA, 638 P.2d 278 (Colo. 1982).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-1-102(a) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-1-102(c) — 2 cases
People ex rel. A.W.R., 17 P.3d 192 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000).
People Ex Rel. Awr, 17 P.3d 192 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-1-102(d) — 2 cases
People v. Legler, 969 P.2d 691 (Colo. 1998).
People v. Dandrea, 736 P.2d 1211 (Colo. 1987).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-1-102(l)(a) — 3 cases
In re the People ex rel. W.P., 295 P.3d 514 (Colo. 2013).
People in Interest of ARM, 832 P.2d 1093 (Colo. Ct. App. 1992).
Nicholas v. People, 973 P.2d 1209 (Colo. 1999).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.